Was he evil? Was there apt reason for the folks of his time to crucify him? Who were the evil ones in that case?Jesus was a rather decent Luciferian .
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Was he evil? Was there apt reason for the folks of his time to crucify him? Who were the evil ones in that case?Jesus was a rather decent Luciferian .
Was he evil? Was there apt reason for the folks of his time to crucify him? Who were the evil ones in that case?
Have you ever met anyone who is continually contrary just for the sake of being contrary?
That's one lame life goal.
Getting back to the topic of the thread: Do you have to be evil to be LHP?What?
Hipsters? Yes, they are annoying. Being unique is too mainstream
Getting back to the topic of the thread: Do you have to be evil to be LHP?
Agreed.No matter whether you're LHP, RHP, middle path or none of the above you will almost inevitably do/think/believe something that somebody considers evil. It's all a matter of perspective.
A little discernment goes a long way when breaking taboos. Some societal taboos are actually silly and cause people to be silly. These taboos are a hindrance--breaking them can be enlightening. Other taboos are taboo for good reason--breaking them can lead to a lack of discernment and be detrimental to your mind. Again, a little discernment can go a long way.In regards to more "classically evil" acts including, but not limited to, breaking the law in a serious way my own perspective is somewhat pragmatic. What do you expect to gain and is it worth the risk? I know of some fringe LHP groups (whose existence beyond the odd bit of internet propaganda is up for debate) who actively encourage law breaking and "evil" acts in order to transcend societal taboos. I can't say this is something I find particularly clever though, to my mind if you want to take charge of your life then self preservation ranks much more highly than taboo breaking.
Well, he did use a lot of metaphors like, "You are like whitewashed tombs, which appear beautiful on the outside, but inside are full of dead mens bones and every impurity." He constantly pointed towards the inward path of transformation. You can be adversarial and such all you like, but if you don't do the inner work, how does that LHP differ from the RHP that doesn't focus on the inner work as well?