mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
And your "IMO" is subjective.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Disproof of Darwinism
- Thread starter questfortruth
- Start date
And your "IMO" is subjective.
Like I said, we can look at the same thing and come to two completely different conclusions.
or proof
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
or proof
Or evidence for the fact, that you don't understand proof.
Yes, attacking the poster is always a good defense.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Well, if there is something, you don't understand then that is no different than other humans. Nobody apparently understands everything. E.g. there are part of logic and mathematics I don't understand and I accept that.
So I am not attacking you, I am pointed out that you don't understand how proof works. That you perceive that as an attack is on you.
McBell
mantra-chanting henotheistic snake handler
It is a common distraction tactic.
ecco
Veteran Member
I wasn't attacking you. I asked a question. If English is your first language then I have to wonder about...
I don't know of any public school in the USA that gives gold medals for completing school. So, perhaps you were homeschooled. That might explain your utter lack of knowledge of Evolution and your grammar. Again, that is not an attack on you, it is an observation about your educators.
If English is not your first language and you were educated outside the USA, then grammatical errors would be overlooked and you would be applauded for being bi-lingual, which most of us are not.
ecco
Veteran Member
Oh, he's serious.
ecco
Veteran Member
It is not just "a construct of human thought". It's the result/conclusion of years of scientific research and study. Your general dismissal of the validity of science is well known.
Scientists agree that humans are mammalian animals just like dogs and apes. Your disagreements with science are immaterial for two reasons:
- You have no education in science
- Your beliefs are based on superstition
Heyo
Veteran Member
Yes, I am. That's the way humans communicate. They agree upon the meaning of words. When you don't agree, you lose the ability to communicate.
It does - by the definition of the word.
Secret Chief
nirvana is samsara
No, because God does not exist.Yes, there are other beings, but those aren't the ones that God formed from the earth.
McBell
mantra-chanting henotheistic snake handler
I know.
I am just not bored enough to continue feeding him.
Though, that may change later.
Secret Chief
nirvana is samsara
And this shows Homo with souls being superior to Pongo that do not have souls.
The instruct me. For me, if there is a creation, then there is a Creator and thus it is proof.
If you find a parent of two different species, it is a proof.
Yes, but even man has to readjust when new information is received. They debunk what was agreed upon and then regroup on some other type of basis of agreement.
And, again, no. Though a platypus has reptile characteristics, man still says it is a mammal for other reasons. Thus, I believe man is a separate entity though it has some characteristics that are like animals.
Yes, we all have our positions. I respect your position. Don't agree, but I do respect your right to have a differing viewpoint.No, because God does not exist.
I never said animals don't have souls
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
You don't understand biological evolution. That is okay. You don't have to, to have a good enough life and be a good enough human.
Secret Chief
nirvana is samsara
I apologise, you said "spirit." I've seen it said only humans have souls. IMO, my point is I don't see sacrificing as anything signifying a superior (in some way) life form.