firedragon
Veteran Member
I am opening this topic due to the insistence of a person to discuss this topic in an irrelevant one. Thus, this maybe a better place to discuss this.
Someone said.
Whether or not it is recorded in the Quran is irrelevant to the fact that Muhammad claimed to have received the revelation that adulterers should be stoned and he was so sure of the truthfulness of this idea that he performed the deed himself.
Yes - he did tell his followers not to record this particular revelation in the Quran - after the fact - but that looks more like an admission of guilt or cover up than anything else.
So - yes - it was never written in the Quran - but Muhammad taught it as revelation and acted on it - which is more historically relevant.
Thats what this someone said. So these are my questions.
1. What is the historical data that proves Muhammed claimed to have received the revelation that adulterers should be stoned, and he was so sure of the truthfulness of this idea that he performed the deed himself?
2. What is the historical data that proves he told his followers not to record this particular revelation?
3. Please provide evidence that this is historical. What is the analysis done?
It is indeed an interesting topic. So there. Its open.
Someone said.
Whether or not it is recorded in the Quran is irrelevant to the fact that Muhammad claimed to have received the revelation that adulterers should be stoned and he was so sure of the truthfulness of this idea that he performed the deed himself.
Yes - he did tell his followers not to record this particular revelation in the Quran - after the fact - but that looks more like an admission of guilt or cover up than anything else.
So - yes - it was never written in the Quran - but Muhammad taught it as revelation and acted on it - which is more historically relevant.
Thats what this someone said. So these are my questions.
1. What is the historical data that proves Muhammed claimed to have received the revelation that adulterers should be stoned, and he was so sure of the truthfulness of this idea that he performed the deed himself?
2. What is the historical data that proves he told his followers not to record this particular revelation?
3. Please provide evidence that this is historical. What is the analysis done?
It is indeed an interesting topic. So there. Its open.