john313
warrior-poet
Peace,
You are making A LOT of generalizations concerning Tibet. I could say that Americans speak only English, this is true for the vast majority; i also kow many who speak many other languages. Just because some people in a country or even most are pagan does not mean they are all pagan. Tibet would actually be a perfect spot to preserve a sacred text from the governing authorities wanting to destroy it because they decided it was not holy or divinely inspired. I agree that anyone can post things on the internet, but without the original texts in front of me, which will most likely not happen and i am guessing you have not seen them either; we have to rely on information from other sources, other people. My sources are not less credible than yours simply because you disagree with them. I can copy and paste from many other sources, and i'm sure you can as well, but there is no point. There is information supporting both sides. as far as the date the Gospel of teh Nazarenes was written i have seen different views on that as well. from right after the crucifiction to 160 ad. If there is something that disagrees with Matthew, it does not automatically mean that Matthew is right. Also i do not know if there are variances in the original languages and they were just translated differently, this happens a lot.
I think we might be getting a little off topic
Regardless of the status of this gospel, Jesus did not free us from the law.
You are making A LOT of generalizations concerning Tibet. I could say that Americans speak only English, this is true for the vast majority; i also kow many who speak many other languages. Just because some people in a country or even most are pagan does not mean they are all pagan. Tibet would actually be a perfect spot to preserve a sacred text from the governing authorities wanting to destroy it because they decided it was not holy or divinely inspired. I agree that anyone can post things on the internet, but without the original texts in front of me, which will most likely not happen and i am guessing you have not seen them either; we have to rely on information from other sources, other people. My sources are not less credible than yours simply because you disagree with them. I can copy and paste from many other sources, and i'm sure you can as well, but there is no point. There is information supporting both sides. as far as the date the Gospel of teh Nazarenes was written i have seen different views on that as well. from right after the crucifiction to 160 ad. If there is something that disagrees with Matthew, it does not automatically mean that Matthew is right. Also i do not know if there are variances in the original languages and they were just translated differently, this happens a lot.
I think we might be getting a little off topic
Regardless of the status of this gospel, Jesus did not free us from the law.