Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
^ a really dumb post ...Not bad.
Warren is a winner all around. However, I have yet to look at Buttigieg thoroughly.
The real question (for you in particular — but also for many others like you) is, after you don’t get your primary pick, will you try to undermine the USA once again by voting for tRump one more time?
OK.Oh, you rascal.....if you guys present us with another unholy
choice between 2 evils, it won't be me undermining Ameristan.
What is your obsession with hawk after hawk?
Try a peacenik this time....not another corrupt same old same old.
Please expand on this.^ a really dumb post ...
If you guys ran Andrew Yang for Prez, he'd get my vote.
Based upon preliminary info (so my choice is not cast in
concrete quite yet), he looks far better than his competition.
I prefer to not examine primary candidates in detail,OK.
Follow-up question.
Which of the remaining 10 Democratic candidates for 2020 presidency do you consider to be a war-hawk, and why?
I haven't heard her, & don't know what she looks like.I'd have to seriously think if Gabbard got the nomination, but Biden, Sander, or Warren - PFFT.
Let's face it, Gabbard has what it takes to win (or at least come damn close):
1) She's hot. (Yeah, basic, but it always helps.)
2) Intelligent.
3) Talks far better than Trump.
4) Is active in the military, and anti-war hawk.
5) Immediately negates all possible Trump roasting -- he'll have to talk on issues, that's Gabbard's game.
6) Can appeal to moderate voters because she's center-left...
7) Has many years experience as a Congresswoman which will help her get things done.
8) Insanely good disposition -- something lacking in all other candidates.
9) Young, but not too young. Health issues won't likely ever be a problem with her. For all the rest of the candidates this is a big issue.
You aren't going to "undermine the USA once again"
by giving us a Hillary clone, are you?
Clonish enuf...hawk, corrupt, old school big government handout type.I don't think Warren is a 'Hillary clone', as she waited 'till the last minute before endorsing her. I think she was for Sanders.
10) Polls at 1%.I'd have to seriously think if Gabbard got the nomination, but Biden, Sander, or Warren - PFFT.
Let's face it, Gabbard has what it takes to win (or at least come damn close):
1) She's hot. (Yeah, basic, but it always helps.)
2) Intelligent.
3) Talks far better than Trump.
4) Is active in the military, and anti-war hawk.
5) Immediately negates all possible Trump roasting -- he'll have to talk on issues, that's Gabbard's game.
6) Can appeal to moderate voters because she's center-left...
7) Has many years experience as a Congresswoman which will help her get things done.
8) Insanely good disposition -- something lacking in all other candidates.
9) Young, but not too young. Health issues won't likely ever be a problem with her. For all the rest of the candidates this is a big issue.
Funny boy....Hillary’s skills and outlook would have made the economic and geopolitical environment of the US as well as the whole planet much more stable and less prone to war than the senile lying whack-a-mole that is our current POTUS tRump.I prefer to not examine primary candidates in detail,
but one of their current leaders, Warren, is hawkish
regarding Israel. I'd prefer Bernie or Yang.
You aren't going to "undermine the USA once again"
by giving us a Hillary clone, are you?
For a second there , I thought it was Mr. Bean.
I don't know yet/I don't know yet.
BTW, is there anyone running with the name "Anyonebuttrump"?
Yes, many of you believed that.Funny boy....Hillary’s skills and outlook would have made the economic and geopolitical environment of the US as well as the whole planet much more stable and less prone to war than the...
(I've heard Yang,
Clonish enuf...hawk, corrupt, old school big government handout type.
Will she embrace the pantsuit?
10) Polls at 1%.
Oh, there are worse options than her.Warren has been our senator for several years and know her well, she is none of the things you accuse her of.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts has been one of the fiercest critics of the proposed trade pact with Asian nations. (Photo: Susan Walsh/AP)
Warren and other critics of the Asian trade pact have seized on a series of complaints in their efforts to stop Congress from giving Obama so-called fast-track authority, which would enable him to put the final deal before Congress on an up-or-down vote, without endless amendments. (Obama, by the way, would be the first president in decades to be denied that authority — and by lawmakers in his own party, no less.)
Why Obama is happy to fight Elizabeth Warren on the trade deal