I draw the line at freedom being denied and rights being violated.
Understood
So you must be outraged because the comedian is facing jail time for making an offensive joke then?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I draw the line at freedom being denied and rights being violated.
Brazil: Jail Term for Comedian Harms Free Speech
Free to speak, but not free of consequence. An insight into a future not far away.
Brazil: Jail Term for Comedian Harms Free Speech
Free to speak, but not free of consequence. An insight into a future not far away.
Isn't it more disrespectful to veterans to threaten people with violence for exercising the very rights and freedoms that they fought for?
The legality of it is not in question. I've known a many veteran that would gladly take an assault charge, sit in a cell for a day until they can get bonded out, and face a day in court, to make a point though. I don't condone it, but I can't blame them either.
Believe it or not, as a Viet Nam era veteran, I agree with you on this one (no, hell hasn't frozen over). The reason we should ever fight is because we enjoy these freedoms. If I go down to Walmart and spend $9.95 for a flag, then that flag is my property to do what I please; which may include stomping, burning, displaying 24/7, or whatever. However, if you try to take my flag or destroy my flag (i.e., property) then we have a problem. Having said that, I understand the feelings of the vets from that era. What we personally endured when we returned to the States still leaves a bad taste in the mouths of many old guys.
It doesn't matter. They are not being harmed, they are not in danger or being threatened, and thus there no reason or excuse to accept physically attacking someone who is exercising their rights is ever acceptable.Is it a disagreement or disrespect though?
Those "rights and liberties" that people like to remind us troops fight and die for, it does just as well include the right to desecrate the flag. And also a part of belonging to a "civilized" society is being civil towards those you disagree with. Flag desecration harms no one, thus there is no valid reason or excuse for retaliating against someone exercising their Constitutional rights that the Supreme Court has ruled on.To a veteran seeing someone desecrate the flag after the horrors they faced serving the country, it might as well be a slap in the face. So I could understand a veteran reacting this way. This doesn't make the veteran immune to an assault charge though. So there's that.
Go back and read my answer to the first time you asked me this.Understood
So you must be outraged because the comedian is facing jail time for making an offensive joke then?
I've never understood that either. Widely and mostly, it was involuntary, under the penalty of law, and often no means to escape. But a generation later, where the service was widely and mostly voluntary, they get thanked outright and are considered sacred.What we personally endured when we returned to the States still leaves a bad taste in the mouths of many old guys.
Anyone who would retaliate like that is a pathetic snowflake.The legality of it is not in question. I've known a many veteran that would gladly take an assault charge, sit in a cell for a day until they can get bonded out, and face a day in court, to make a point though. I don't condone it, but I can't blame them either.
Isn't denying someone the right to burn a flag that represents freedom of speech and expression a bigger desecration than the actual burning?
Anyone who would retaliate like that is a pathetic snowflake.
If someone is jailed by the government for speaking, then they're not free to speak.Brazil: Jail Term for Comedian Harms Free Speech
Free to speak, but not free of consequence. An insight into a future not far away.
...you would confirm and validate my statement?If I ever were to meet you ...
This whole Vietnam War, Flag Burning issue is far too charged and emotional feeling for me. This was an extremely traumatic time in my life and most people have no idea about it. Why? Because most of them were not dragged into a Military Service for a War that they did not understand, but were forced into upon threat of prison and loss of citizenship. Then the whole thing is judged and pontificated on by those who have no frame of reference, and when young american citizens were involved in this issue, having their lives threatened, or lost in many cases, many of the most critical were having wild parties, drinking and smoking weed.
I'm going to ask you once again to leave off it.
If the people laughed , he should be set free and all charges dismissed.What say you on the topic of the article then?
Should he face jail time for his "crime"?
I mean...it sounds like you're condoning it.
Go back and read my answer to the first time you asked me this.
It doesn't matter. They are not being harmed, they are not in danger or being threatened, and thus there no reason or excuse to accept physically attacking someone who is exercising their rights is ever acceptable.
Those "rights and liberties" that people like to remind us troops fight and die for, it does just as well include the right to desecrate the flag. And also a part of belonging to a "civilized" society is being civil towards those you disagree with. Flag desecration harms no one, thus there is no valid reason or excuse for retaliating against someone exercising their Constitutional rights that the Supreme Court has ruled on.