Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
i think that any baptism done by anyone, is ok - so long as it is the truth from your heart, becaus i dotn think god will turn round and say "oi, get out of my heaven, you didn't get baptised by someone with a piece of paper saying they can baptise people!"Aqualung said:Do priests need authority from god to do certain works, like baptisms, and how do they get that authority?
Glad to hear it.im considering my own baptism
corrupt_preist said:i think that any baptism done by anyone, is ok - so long as it is the truth from your heart, becaus i dotn think god will turn round and say "oi, get out of my heaven, you didn't get baptised by someone with a piece of paper saying they can baptise people!"
im concidering my own baptism, ive only really been testing the water up until now, been a christian for about half a year now - so i think im ready to jump full in now
so im also concidering how to have it done, where to have it done, who i think is best to do it
and the conclusion i reached
it doesn't matter, what matters is that it is my commitment to God and to Christ, they care about me, not which pool i decide to get splahsed in
C_P
Do you have a scriptural basis for that? because as far as I can think he never said, "anybody can baptise anybody."corrupt_priest said:i think that any baptism done by anyone, is ok
is what i said after it - context my dear, contextcorrupt_preist said:- so long as it is the truth from your heart
Yup.Aqualung said:Do priests need authority from god to do certain works
If someone is dieing I am allowed to baptize the person but usually it's the priest that does it. The authority is given to him thru the extenstion of the bishop. The bishop is gets it thru apostolic succession. The source leads to Christ.Aqualung said:like baptisms, and how do they get that authority?
Lots of people base their religion in their heart. Do you think you get closer to the truth by following what your human (and therefore imperfect, faulty) heart says, or what God's revealed word says?corrupt_preist said:is what i said after it - context my dear, context
no its not based in scripture, its based in your heart! as i stressed in my post, baptism is about your commitment to God and to Christ, the rest is just petty detail in comparison - in my oppinion, of course
C_P
As far as I know, it will be you (the catholics) and us (the latter day saints) against the rest of the christian world on this one, and your input in this argument will definitely be a good thing. :bounceVictor said:Yup.
If someone is dieing I am allowed to baptize the person but usually it's the priest that does it. The authority is given to him thru the extenstion of the bishop. The bishop is gets it thru apostolic succession. The source leads to Christ.
~Victor
I think you might be right... there are not many Lutherans or other non-Catholic Christians on this forum who might agree with us.Aqualung said:As far as I know, it will be you (the catholics) and us (the latter day saints) against the rest of the christian world on this one,
the truth, as i understand it, is that baptism is about you placing you life and heart and soul in God's hands, and your commitment to following christAqualung said:Lots of people base their religion in their heart. Do you think you get closer to the truth by following what your human (and therefore imperfect, faulty) heart says, or what God's revealed word says?
No. That's what it's all about. It's for the remission of sins, and a promise that you will follow him in all you do. But the baptism doesn't really count if it's not done by someone with authority.corrupt_preist said:the truth, as i understand it, is that baptism is about you placing you life and heart and soul in God's hands, and your commitment to following christ
am i wrong?
Isn't that what a debate is all about? I tell you my proposition, you tell me I'm wrong, and why, and then I tell you you're wrong and why? Of course I think you're wrong! That's why I'm debating and not flatly agreeing with what you say! But I don't mean offense by it. I don't hate you. In fact, I like you. I'm not meaning to be contentious, but to say that I don't disagree is a lie.C_P said:now, im not going to make a big song and dance about this, but the way your post was posed suggested (to me atleast) that you are saying i follow a perverted truth as appose to God's truth
C_P said:i am not saying other denominations can't do it how they want to do it, but to me, baptism is this commitment to God and to Christ, and so long as that is the core of what you are doing, what does it matter who does it?[/qutoe]
Then why did Jesus only give the authority to baptise to certain people? Why didn't he say to everybody to go out and baptise people, instead of just saying it to his apostles, to whom he gave the authority to baptise?
I'm not asking opinions. That's why I put it in the debates thread. Your response made me think you wanted to debate, not just share beleifs.C_P said:i am inclined to ask why you started this thread, if your asking oppinions and then claiming these other oppinions are not in the name of God
To an extent, yes. There's the fact that obviously you love Jesus, and you accept him as your saviour, and you think that this baptism is good enough, and I'm sure he won't overlook that. But there is also the fact that a baptism must be done by one who has proper authority.C_P said:would you think my baptism was inadiquet if i told you it was performed by a close friend whom i love, who is not a minister, priest, or any other authoritve figure in any church denomination? (pretending of course that i was already baptised)
I'm just debating with you. In a debate you are of course going to say that someone is wrong. You can't have much of a debate if everybody agrees on everything.C_P said:im sorry for the tone of my post aswell, but i did feel you were hinting my faith is based on something that is not God
C_P
And I appologize if I came off as personally hostile. I meant to just express disagreement and why I disagreed, not attack you personally.
corrupt_preist said:is what i said after it - context my dear, context
no its not based in scripture, its based in your heart! as i stressed in my post, baptism is about your commitment to God and to Christ, the rest is just petty detail in comparison - in my oppinion, of course
C_P
Don't forget the Orthodox. And, as Scott suggested, the Lutheran church I grew up in would also agree. I believe, though am not certain, that the Anglicans would also.Aqualung said:As far as I know, it will be you (the catholics) and us (the latter day saints) against the rest of the christian world on this one, and your input in this argument will definitely be a good thing. :bounce
Oh. I don't know enough about the orthodox, lutheran, or anglican churches to just include them or exclude them with one fell swoop, So thank you.IacobPersul said:Don't forget the Orthodox. And, as Scott suggested, the Lutheran church I grew up in would also agree. I believe, though am not certain, that the Anglicans would also.
James
Then why did Jesus even bother setting certain people apart? Why did he bother calling 12 apostles if everybody is equal? And why was it only them to whom he gave ceratin authorities, like to cast out demons? And if being an apostle does not take certain Aauthorit (we are all apostles in God's eyes), why did the remaining eleven take such care, and pray so much, about who would fill Judas's spot?corrupt_preist said:i think the disagreement here is over the word "authority"
i believe that their is only one hierarchy in the christian faith, and that is jesu at the top, and all of us underneath (ie. on the same level)
so i do not believe that someone has more 'authority' than me, or anyone else, in the christian community (except for Jesus and God)
when i read this verse in mathew, i had to ak myself why he wrote itAqualung said:Then why did Jesus even bother setting certain people apart? Why did he bother calling 12 apostles if everybody is equal? And why was it only them to whom he gave ceratin authorities, like to cast out demons? And if being an apostle does not take certain Aauthorit (we are all apostles in God's eyes), why did the remaining eleven take such care, and pray so much, about who would fill Judas's spot?
Where's the scriptural basis that says, "only an authorized priest can baptise anyone and have it 'count' in God's eyes"?Aqualung said:Do you have a scriptural basis for that? because as far as I can think he never said, "anybody can baptise anybody."
i don't think that in him naming a few people who can do this, he was implying tha tno one else can do itAqualung said:If he really wanted everybody to baptise people, he would have made that clear over and over. Like part of his sermon on the mount would have been about baptising people. Or he would given at least an indication that they could baptise people. It's not just that they follow him. He had a ton of followers. It's that they were given the authority.