You're not addressing my arguments.
Yes, I did. Why are you now running away?
Your argument was that you had a right to hear specific speech ("If Counter protestors shout over a speech I want to hear, then isn't that impinging on my constitutional rights?" -Icehorse). I want to know where you think that right comes from. I also then made the logical conclusion that if your "right to hear" was enforced, then that would necessarily result in the freedom of speech of others being curtailed.
Your other argument was that the counter protestors infringed upon the Nazi's freedom of speech. I asked you to explain where in the Constitution it says that citizens must provide others with a platform for their speech, or where it says that citizens must refrain from interrupting or interfering with other people's speech. I also made the logical conclusion that if you believe the counter protesters should not have been allowed to speak, then you are, in fact, advocating the restriction of freedom of speech.
You can feel free to correct any misconceptions I have regarding your arguments. But they are your arguments, and I specifically addressed them.