Interesting.
The term is so confusing to you, you are completely unable to define it, but try in vain to turn it around claiming it is to difficult for me?
Let me guess, "fast fire" is also to difficult for you to define, right?
I sincerely hope you do not expect to be taken seriously.
Well, yes.
I do............ you see, if folks want they can spin 'fast-fire' or 'military style' or 'assault rifle' all over the place, possibly in the hope of redirecting or slowing decisions. But Canada didn't do that it called the guns to be banned 'Military style', I think. And that has to be taken seriously.
I think New Zealand called them assault rifles....... but their new law has been taken very seriously.
In the UK such terms were not used. Guns that could fire
more than three shots without reloading were banned. So semi-automatic shotguns were still legal, as long as their magazines could only hold two cartridges.
Different countries have used differing definitions, but all need to be taken seriously.
I think Taiwan banned assault rifles. Can't remember now.