R34L1TY
Neurology Nerd.
This is true if and only if "a spiritual being exists" cannot be tested by experiment, i.e. there is no possible test we could do that behaves differently than we'd expect, due to spiritual beings.
And if spiritual beings affect literally nothing, in what way can they be said to exist?
Unfortunately you cannot prove that something spiritual does or does not exist. Just because you don't think it affects something or can't be tested by an experiment does not mean it doesn't exist. Yes..we can conclude that the factual evidence is against the existance of a creator but that doesn't mean we can disprove of a spiritual one.
I understand what you're saying but proving something doesn't exist 99.9999% is still not proving that it doesn't exist. The evidence would be on our side but we must keep an open mind to the "what ifs."
You cannot disprove spirituality and what it leads to. I agree that just because I cannot prove that unicorns never existed (talking about actual ones; not rhinoceroses) doesn't mean that they should be looked at as if they do. Its the same concept with everything in science. There is no such thing as 100% certainty which is what makes it interesting.