OMG. lol. I have avoided watching that series, but wow! Yeah, that's what they want alright.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
OMG. lol. I have avoided watching that series, but wow! Yeah, that's what they want alright.
As she should be.Boebert is definitely close to the top of the list.
Would you trust it to be easily re-writtenThe intention is that would have been rewritten about a dozen times by now. But despite this intention the living not be governed by the dead we are still governed by the dead.
That's not saying we should do it this way or that, it's saying that is the actual Original Intent according to the Founding Fathers themselves.
As I said, I am not speaking my own thoughts about it. I am simply pointing out that is the original intent, making the Original Intent philosophies and ideologies a paradox.Would you trust it to be easily re-written
during Trump's or Nixon's reign?
I prefer that it be difficult to amend, which
confers some immunity to the passion of
the times. Look what happened when
prohibition made it in too easily.
Your paradox claim escapes me.As I said, I am not speaking my own thoughts about it. I am simply pointing out that is the original intent, making the Original Intent philosophies and ideologies a paradox.
And I don't know how to describe my positions. The trend towards expanding voting rights is definitely good, and while the original intentions saved us from some of Trumps worse it wasn't enough.
Like ' known science '. What is known up to this point in time.Yep. Religion is/can be a great and wonderful fantasy, but when it encroaches on things like scientific knowledge and the like, some serious trouble can become of it if science dosent take precedent over a number of beliefs that attempt to zealously override the reality of what science discovers and confirms.
People who hate constitutional originalism
should consider that this is the source of separation of church & state.
I predict an eternal battle with fundies who want a theocracy in Ameristan.
I look at things far less technically.There is a difference between the modern-day definition of theocracy which is rule by clergy or clergy class.
That is Not the Theocracy ( thy kingdom come.... ) that Jesus believed in. - Daniel 2:44-45; Daniel 7:13-14
Jesus did Not set up a clergy class that exists in today's churches.
That happened 'after ' the first century ended - Acts of the Apostles 20:29-30
Saying, 'an eternal battle with fundies.....' might well prove to be a trigger as to why the powers in charge will 'surprisingly' turn on the religious world starting with so-called Christians - 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3
Theocracy or rather to religionize ___________I look at things far less technically.
Theocracy is simply when religion exercises great power to impose its prescriptions & proscriptions on the populace.