What do you mean 'who said'?
I believe the question is clear and simple enough. "Who Said?"
Who is the authority that gets to dictate stuff like this?
Unclear prophecies can be "fulfilled" multiple times. That makes them failures.
.........or wild successes, depending upon ones POV.
They are simply likely events and not prophecies. And given enough time almost anything will come true. That is why a time limit is needed to. It is not a matter of "who" it is a matter of "what" and the "what" is logic.
And please, learn what "begging the question" means.
I used the term correctly. Perhaps you should look it up?
What are you asking here? My point is that if people want to try to use prophecies as "proof" of Jesus then those prophecies have to follow logical rules. Otherwise you just have the saying of Nostradamus all over again.
Uhmn....wait. Where in the OP did you mention 'proving Jesus?" I mean, the video concentrates on the bible, but in your OP you stated that we didn't have to watch the video, because it wasn't a prerequisite to discussing prophecy. Therefore one can reasonably conclude that you wish to discuss prophecy in general, not prophecy in regards to, specifically, 'proving Jesus."
It seems to me, then, that you are moving the goal posts a bit here.
(shrug) just as a disclaimer, and this might sound odd given that I'm a dyed in the wool theist and all, I was only able to watch the first couple of minutes or so of the video (time constraints) and I agreed with what he had to say. The bible is NOT a science text and was never meant to be one.
I'll probably watch the rest of it later, but since you didn't make doing so a prerequisite for discussing prophecy......
When did you decide that you only wanted to talk about prophecy that 'proved Jesus,' and again, who established the parameters you insist we use?
And why should we pay attention?