However if you don't do wrong, nothing to feel guilt about right?
Are you claiming that you have never done anything wrong? That is, that you have never done anything that violates your personal ethical code?
You are unique, if so. Congratulations, if so.
I look at it differently, I don't intent to do wrong. My intention is to do the right thing to the best of my ability. However if I do something "wrong", it's not really my fault since my intent was to do the right thing. I didn't know enough, wasn't smart enough, basically wasn't able at the time to do the right thing. So you can't really blame me for not doing something I was not capable of doing.
I see. "the devil made me do it" defense. (grin...sorry about that. Couldn't resist...should have, intended to, but, er, just couldn't.)
On the other hand, if I intended to do "wrong" then it's what I wanted to do, for whatever nefarious reason, what's there to feel guilt about in doing what I intended to do?
Because whatever it was you did was against your personal ethical code? Just asking, not accusing.
Honestly, I agree. Atheists are as likely to run the gamut of human nature as anyone else. Unfortunately though nobody trusts an atheist, even though they are as likely to be as trustworthy as anyone.
I don't have a problem trusting an atheist. Whether one's personal ethical code is based upon a theistic belief system, or a personal conviction...perhaps 'humanism,' or just 'enlightened self interest,' one can generally trust the honor of those who hold to that personal code. I mean, really; if I thought that one could only trust those who claimed one's OWN specific code of ethics/morals, one couldn't trust anybody at all. Honor is honor.
(added thought) Y'know, an 'honorable atheist' is probably more to be trusted than a theist who claims to be faithful, but only has honor because s/he's afraid of the eternal consequences of not being honorable. Any honorable person bases his or her honor upon a personal conviction of right and wrong as compared to a belief system, quite apart from possible consequences; doing the 'right' thing regardless of possible consequences, and willing to accept the consequences of being 'honorable,' even if they seem to be negative.
OK, that was fuzzy, but I hope the reader can figure out what I just wrote.
What are you talking about? Of course they did.