Thank you! I see an investigation into Indian astrology (that's bunk), a refutation of sun-sign astrology (also bunk), refutations of claims that astrologers would not make (that occupation can be predicted), claims by a man whose published work included basic errors of mathematics and astronomy (Geoffrey Dean), etc. As I've said, if you want to cite evidence against something, you can always find it — or invent it, as CSICOP has done. Of course, you may say say the same of me! In the last analysis, we all have to make up our mind about what constitutes evidence and how we evaluate it.