OK. I receive a weekly Davar (by email) from a Rabbi in London (Shaul Rosenblatt, you may have heard of him). Anyway he's open to questions. He claims that the tablets that Moses received with the 10 commandments were really in the form of a cube and the writing went all the way through and could be read from both sides. It involved two miracles, one that the writing was not laterally inverted on one side and also that there's a "dot" that hung unsupported in mid air. I challenged him on this as it doesn't say that in the Bible. He replied that not all these things should be taken too literally. I raised this with a gentleman on RF (I forget his name) who was saying that nobody can understand Torah without learning Hebrew and a lifetime of study. He replied that there was support for it, but just quoted the Hebrew, which wasn't much help.
My questions to you: Are you familiar with this? Do you think it is literally true? In general, should all Torah and the interpretations by the Rabbis be taken literally?
Yes, I am familiar with both ideas.
Regarding the shape of the tablets, it is brought in several Talmudic sources (for example,
Bava Batra 14a) that each of the tablets was six hands in length and height and three hands in width, so when put together, they formed a cube.
Regarding the writing, that is likewise brought in Talmudic sources (for example,
Shabbat 104a) , that the letters were hollow. There is a dispute there regarding whether the Hebrew letter Mem appeared both in its open version מ and in its closed version ם. If the closed version appeared, then the "filling" of the Mem hung in midair. The same is true regarding the letter Samekh ס, which only has a closed version.
Here's a model of the tablets according to Talmudic sources:
(from
Hebrew Wikipedia)
Both interpretations are based on certain verses in the Torah. Regarding the shape, there's this verse:
"and they saw the God of Israel—under whose feet was the likeness of a brick of sapphire, like the very sky for purity." (Exodus 24:10)
Then God says to Moses:
"The LORD said to Moses, “Come up to Me on the mountain and wait there, and I will give you the stone tablets with the teachings and commandments which I have inscribed to instruct them.”"
The only type of stone mentioned in this chapter is sapphire, so it was suggested that the sapphire brick beneath God was the tablets. Perhaps block would be a better translation. The Hebrew word is simply לבנה, which can be understood either way.
Regarding the hollow letters, this is based on the following verse:
"Thereupon Moses turned and went down from the mountain bearing the two tablets of the Pact, tablets inscribed on both their surfaces: they were inscribed on the one side and on the other." (Exodus 32:15)
I personally see no reason not to accept these interpretations, considering the whole event was super miraculous, but my world wouldn't be thrown for a whirl if it turned out that these interpretations were not correct.
With that said, often times ideas presented in various Talmudic sources are not intended to be taken at face value, so perhaps the sages did not mean that the tablets literally looked like this and were instead teaching a deeper, more profound idea. So to answer your last question, no, we should not understand all of the teachings of the rabbis literally.