Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If you shortened the life cycle to 13 or 14 years you could. Or perhaps if you shortened the time for childhood to 2 months in the womb and a year to teenage you could greatly reduce the human reliance upon systems. Mothers would only need about a year to raise their kids, and then they could go into a state of anarchy for the rest of their lives.
We'd probably kill each other off until we finally came to our senses and abandoned anarchy.
My type of thread
after some reading and possibly after work too. 
True anarchy, as I understand it, would basically just be a big reset button. Tribes and groups will form and the ones with more power will dominate the ones with less power, grow bigger and unite with others to grow even bigger yet. In a few centuries we'd start seeing large colonies form and, in another few decades, countries.
I'm an anarchist ever since I read Proudhon and Godwin in (our equivalent of) high school.
I think you need to watch your spelling:
Looks like a lot of work in my least favourite subjects - politics and economics - to have enough of an understanding to comment.
Anarchy runs counter to human nature.
If I knew how to spell, I prolly would be outI think you need to watch your spelling:
Word origin: MGr anachronismos < anachronizein, to refer to a wrong time < Gr ana-, against + chronos, time
Anarchy? Not for me I think, given that the wealthy will likely still be in charge.
We love you hear
My voice in a text based forum is indeed mellifluous.We love you hear
