firedragon
Veteran Member
The question is. Just because a person holds a belief, could be religious belief, or science for that matter. Just because someone else comes along and say "my belief is" does that mean one of them have to be wrong? or can it be that both have a part of the answer, but because they are at different wisdom level they can not see the truth in what the other person say?
Its like this brother. Most of the time, I opine that both of these people will have truth's. You are asking a question that has to be answered from a sociological point of view. In this case, truths are subjective. We find our own truths.
This question would depend upon your questioning premise. Are you asking from an ontological point of view or an epistemological point of view.
Lets say one person comes and says "the God of the Quran speaks of the athanasian trinity" then I would ask for evidence. If another person comes and says there is panentheism in the Tanakh, I would ask for evidence.
Do you understand brother? Evidence matters. Because in this case, evidence to this claim is pretty obviously possible because the books are simply available. It is not something that is invisible or has to be deduced purely by logic or scientific experiment. Hit the books, and show the evidence.
This is why all of this depends on your premise.
If your question is a question purely on a philosophical belief with no books in the background, that's a whole different problem. One could never in their life talk about evidence in this case because there is nothing tangible to go to.
I hope you understand.