Are Atheists smarter than their god?

[questfortruth]

If God knows that God exists, then Atheists are smarter than god?
There are theists who are Nobel Prize winners. Prof. Albert Einstein, to name
but one because he has never said: ``I am atheist.'' For all his religious struggle, Einstein never said it in front of a crowd.

DEBATE IS WELCOMED.

The meaning of the existence of science is the presence of
Absolute Truth, Objective Knowledge, and Verity.
Absolute Truth, Objective Knowledge, Verity -- all three are synonyms, all
three are meaning the same. The All-Knowing is Absolute Truth. He is aware of His existence.
Therefore, the existence of God is Absolutely True and Accurate.

No, atheists will never acknowledge proof of the religious dogmas
because atheists and theists are different paradigms: ``If they hear not
Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose
from the dead.'' Luke 16:31. Is atheism scientific? But why has physics
not proven that there is no spiritual culture? God is part of the spiritual culture.

It is written: ``To whom also he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs.'' Acts 1:3.
Therefore, the religious dogmas are proven to theists, even if atheists are not convinced yet.
The main thing is this: theists know their God. Must I feel the shame of my Religious
Beliefs if there are godlessly aggressive readers? No,
the United Nation enforced human rights defend my beliefs, for it is written:
``Whoever is ashamed of Me and My words, the
Son of Man will be ashamed of them'' Luke 9:26. And the atheists are not hiding their
atheism from the scientific community and are very proud of
their spiritual [but godless] achievements.
For example, the atheist has played Neo in a very spiritual film: The Matrix.

More in:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360014214_INFINITIES_IN_RIEMANN_AND_ABC_CONJECTURES

 

[ChristineM]

Atheist don't have gods, so yes, in general we are smarter than nothing


You should join us

 

[paradox]

If God knows that God exists, then Atheists are smarter than god?

In fact here is what god says about godless:
Wisdom 13:1

 

[questfortruth]

Atheist don't have gods, so yes, in general we are smarter than nothing. You should join us

There are theists who are Nobel Prize winners.
Prof. Albert Einstein, to name but one because he has never said: ``I am atheist.''

 

[questfortruth]

You should join us

And it is fair to reply: "you should join me." Mods, forgive me and her.

 

[questfortruth]

There are theists who are Nobel Prize winners.
Prof. Albert Einstein, to name but one because he has never said: ``I am atheist.''

For all his religious struggle, Einstein never said it in front of a crowd.

 

[Yerda]

If there is a god or gods then I'm sure that they are very clever. The ones often described by theists don't often seem intimidatingly bright and coincidentally appear to think much like the believers doing the describing.

So if, for example, some god made the world and set the rules for how it would change with the plan that people would appear 13.5 billion years after the big bang I'd say they would have to be so smart that we have no idea of how smart. So far in advance of us that we couldn't possibly concieve of how advanced.

If some god, made the world six thousand years ago and has been carefully manipulating everything so that bodies move in accordance with the laws of gravity or poofing new species into existence and then de-existifying them when he gets bored etc then they're very clever but not on the same level as the god described above. The god that writes the program and then let's it play out and arrives at us on purpose is doing some mysterious predictive analysis (because even if the world is deterministic, it's complex and chaotic and impossible to predict except very generally). The god who is busy making things happen all the time is working inefficiently. imo

 

[questfortruth]

often described by theists don't often seem intimidatingly bright

Dear thinker, please watch the video about the beauty of mathematical world. It is not ``necessary'' to accept the thrilled commentaries of the religious-minded professor of mathematics:

 

[ChristineM]

In fact here is what god says about godless:
Wisdom 13:1

Nope, here is where man says god says. As far as i am aware there is no record anywhere of a gospel according to god

 

[questfortruth]

Nope, here is where man says god says. As far as i am aware there is no record anywhere of a gospel according to god

But there are many books according to satan.

 

[SalixIncendium]

There are theists who are Nobel Prize winners.
Prof. Albert Einstein, to name but one because he has never said: ``I am atheist.''

I never said "I am atheist."

I am not a theist.

 

[SalixIncendium]

But there are many books according to satan.

Please cite where Satan claimed this.

 

[questfortruth]

Dear thinker, please watch the video about the beauty of mathematical world. It is not ``necessary'' to accept the thrilled commentaries of the religious-minded professor of mathematics:

The Mandelbrot set is defined as the convergence of the sequence
z^2_n+c=z_{n+1}. Here, the complex-valued number c is a possible
element of the set. The z_1=0. But if the final analytic formula of the sequence is not possible,
the fact of convergence must be a guessing game. Hence, the beauty of
the Mandelbrot set demonstrates the existence of (Good) Luck.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

I never said "I am atheist."

I am not a theist.

Yeah, I understand that one even as an atheist. But for the over reductive crowd it is a strong either/or.

 

[questfortruth]

Please cite where Satan claimed this.

So, around us a white ponies and red roses, no evil at all? The satan is evil, and evil is satan. These two are synonyms.
We will get a blow to satan's plans when the cure for cancer is found.

 

[SalixIncendium]

So, around us a white ponies and red roses, no evil at all? the satan is evil, and evil is satan. these two are synonyms.
We will get blow to satan's plans, when the cure for cancer will be found.

Your double-speak didn't even remotely address my request.

 

[questfortruth]

Your double-speak didn't even remotely address my request.

Sorry for grammar mistakes. I have checked it mistake-free:

So, around us a white ponies and red roses, no evil at all? The satan is evil, and evil is satan. These two are synonyms.
We will get a blow to satan's plans when the cure for cancer is found.

 

[Mock Turtle]

Sorry for grammar mistakes. I have checked it mistake-free:

So, around us a white ponies and red roses, no evil at all? The satan is evil, and evil is satan. These two are synonyms.
We will get a blow to satan's plans when the cure for cancer is found.

Just your, and others mislabelling things - a common mistake.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Sorry for grammar mistakes. I have checked it mistake-free:

So, around us a white ponies and red roses, no evil at all? The satan is evil, and evil is satan. These two are synonyms.
We will get a blow to satan's plans when the cure for cancer is found.

As for your OP of all those positive absolutes, I am not even real. I am so wrong that I am not even nothing, real or actual existing. I am less than nothing for Absolute Truth, Objective Knowledge, and Verity. I am The Wrong One.

Learn to deal with reductio ad absurdum or your system falls apart for really real existing diversity in thinking.
So in effect I didn't write this and you are not looking at it. And that is Absolute Truth, Objective Knowledge, and Verity.

 

[ChristineM]

There are theists who are Nobel Prize winners.
Prof. Albert Einstein, to name but one because he has never said: ``I am atheist.''

And?

Einstein had his own personal god so was not an atheist, he preferred to call himself agnostic or religious non believer.