-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Adam and Eve in human genetics. New results.
- Thread starter questfortruth
- Start date
Any evidence that book is accurate or reliable in any way?
Colt
Well-Known Member
This isn't a UB thread, but you can look at some of the reports on statements in the UB 1934, printed 1955 compared with recent discoveries and decide for yourself. List of UBtheNEWS reports, [research pages], and study aids – UBannotated
tas8831
Well-Known Member
No they weren't.
tas8831
Well-Known Member
Usually because the religionist has little to nothing of value to offer but "belief."
*** Mod Post ***
Please be careful about expressing your opinions as fact:
8. Preaching/Proselytizing
Creating (or linking to) content intended to convert/recruit others to your religion, spirituality, sect/denomination, or lack thereof is not permitted. Similarly, attempting to convert others away from their religion, spiritual convictions, or sect/denomination will also be considered a form of preaching. Stating opinions as a definitive matter of fact (i.e., without "I believe/feel/think" language, and/or without references) may be moderated as preaching.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Do you not realize that that source may be more than just a tad biased? If that is all you have you will never convince anyone that reasons rationally.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I have been a bad boy too often here. To help make amends let me stick my oar in the latest moderation activity:
Can you flesh this out a bit? When you say "Adam and Eve" do you mean the belief that at one point there were only two people?
And to avoid moderation perhaps it is best to explain that the idea of there being only two people at one point has been refuted. The latest population bottleneck for humans was fifty to seventy thousand years ago when the human population got down to about one thousand people. A literal Adam and Eve never appear to have existed.
Can you flesh this out a bit? When you say "Adam and Eve" do you mean the belief that at one point there were only two people?
And to avoid moderation perhaps it is best to explain that the idea of there being only two people at one point has been refuted. The latest population bottleneck for humans was fifty to seventy thousand years ago when the human population got down to about one thousand people. A literal Adam and Eve never appear to have existed.
Colt
Well-Known Member
No, I believe Adam and Eve arrived on our evolved, previously populated, fallen world to replace the administration of the "Crafty beast", a one time loyal administrator caught up in the Lucifer rebellion. They were given bodies using the best of the existing stocks as well as their own unique genetic accompaniment which would subsequently be introduced prematurely into the gene pool due to Eves actual sin, sex with Cain's real Father from the Nodites.
Nealy 40,000 years latter the Israelites created the creation story of origins by appropriating Mesopotamian lore that derived from those ancient times. By then the story of Adam was quite fragmented. They just assumed that Adam and Eve were the first humans.
Such a scenario would explain a lot considering the bits of information in the Genesis story.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Colt
Well-Known Member
What’s bizarre about it?
A revelation from the celestial world that I believe/feel/think
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You have to ask? But then all creation myths tend to be odd.
Have you ever looked for reliable evidence?
Colt
Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Please tell us when you find some.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Sorry, that is not evidence for your beliefs. You first need a falsifiable hypothesis if you want to try to use scientific articles as evidence.
What is your hypothesis? What reasonable test based on the merits of your hypothesis could prove it wrong? If you can't answer these questions you do not have evidence. You only have an ad hoc explanation at best.
Colt
Well-Known Member
Its a close correlation to the times given when Eve and then Adam prematurely mixed with existing human stocks which I believe/feel/think
74:0.1 ADAM AND EVE arrived on Urantia,(earth) from the year A.D. 1934, 37,848 years ago. It was in midseason when the Garden was in the height of bloom that they arrived. At high noon and unannounced, the two seraphic transports, accompanied by the Jerusem personnel intrusted with the transportation of the biologic uplifters to Urantia, settled slowly to the surface of the revolving planet in the vicinity of the temple of the Universal Father. All the work of rematerializing the bodies of Adam and Eve was carried on within the precincts of this newly created shrine. And from the time of their arrival ten days passed before they were re-created in dual human form for presentation as the world's new rulers. They regained consciousness simultaneously. The Material Sons and Daughters always serve together. It is the essence of their service at all times and in all places never to be separated. They are designed to work in pairs; seldom do they function alone." UB 1934, printed 1955
You are welcome to go do your own research on the matter.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
So not evidence at all. As I thought just an ad hoc explanation.
Inquire of God
Member
He is not an ape, like you and I, he is a child of God.
We are not evolved from other species.
This is why we wear clothes.
If we evolved from other species we would not wear clothes.
What would ever have gotten into our minds to wear clothing?
Doesn't make sense to me.
We would have stayed where it is warm all the time and lived like other species live, in an environment that is suited to us, not suiting ourselves to a different environment, effectively taking control of our own evolution.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Humans are apes just like humans are mammals.
Except that we are.
Doesn't follow.
Doesn't follow.
Survival benefits. Protection from the elements
Even to the point of sexual selection, as it also has a decorative dimension.
Maybe that's on you?
Maybe this doesn't make sense to you because you are ill-informed?
Species migrate all the time for a wide variety of reasons. There is nothing strange about that.