Perhaps 'wilfully gullible' is better (and hence dishonest)
Gullibles are gullible; the dishonest are dishonest.
Indubitably, some gullibles are dishonest some of the time; but it seems a huge stretch of imagination to declare all gullibles dishonest all the time.
Indubitably, some dishonest are gullible some of the time, but it seems an equally huge stretch of imagination to declare all dishonest people gullible all of the time.
One doesn't have to be gullible to be dishonest any more than one has to be dishonest to be gullible.
Personally, I believe that "Absolute Space" is an abstract noun that refers to an to an unbounded nothingness through which an unlimited amount of stuff always moves, has always moved, and will always move. So, in my worldview, there's stuff and space, or what Anaximander called the
apeiron. That's a whole lot of stuff and plenty of space to move around, and, moreover, the makings of what I believe, more likely than not, to be a veritable plethora of lifeforms (e.g. beings) and planets to occupy. One thing I don't believe in are entities that are neither pure space nor stuff; nor non-physical spirits or Consciousness.
Am I gullible? Certainly not willfully and not, upon self-examination, unreasonably biased.
Am I dishonest? Show me where, and I'll work on it.
Do I believe a Being exists somewhere in all that stuff that I call God? Yeah, I do. And I'm inclined to believe, more than not, that that Being has made contact with some folks on earth.
And, from what I read in my scriptures, that Being would like to have my attention and wants me to play nice.