Would you just lack belief in my claims or would you go as far as saying absolutely no way is any of that reality? If not, why not?
I have no reason to believe or disbelieve your claim. I'm not even skeptical. It's simply of no particular consequence to me.
Totally evading the point of the entire argument. And completely ignoring what I was asking of you. I give up unless you want to try explaining what I asked you to explain.
I answered your question honestly and directly. It just wasn't the answer you wanted to hear.
That's what you call an honest and direct answer?
An honest and direct answer would be, "I would lack a belief in your claims because [whatever your reason]." You never got to the second half of that. You didn't answer his second question. And since you didn't, inquisitive and analytical people will speculate on why. Why did you decide to not give your reasons? The likeliest explanation is that you sensed that it could be shown that if you gave a reason, it would be the same reason your god claims aren't believed by skeptics - there's no reason to believe them. Nor could you say, "I have no reason." So, you just acted like the question wasn't there.
I've explained to you before how these kinds of answers undermine your ethos, which I've mentioned refers to the meta-messages a speaker or writer sends his audience in addition to the explicit meaning of his argument, such as does he seem knowledgeable, does he seem sincere, does he seem credible, does he seem trustworthy, does he show good judgment, does he seem to have a hidden agenda, is he more interested in convincing with impartial argument or persuading with emotive language or specious argumentation, and the like.
In this case, why is he evading questions? It's certainly not because you have a sound argument that you could have articulated, but decided to ignore the question anyway. You don't shy away from the game when you think you have an answer. So, I conclude that you have no confidence in your ability to answer the question, and thus don't really understand your argument, either.