I think there is sketchy evidence for Isaiah the prophet. And two records of the House of David.
I am not talking about the existence of “House of David”, but that of King David himself.
There are no written records in Israel or other kingdoms that date to David’s supposed reign.
Something that were written or inscribed on something, century or centuries later, are not contemporary.
You do understand what contemporary means, don’t you?
My reading of the Psalms and David's life seem to correlate. And the reign of Solomon seems
to accord with his three books - written in order - Song of Solomon, Proverbs and Ecc.. He
went from being a wise man to a tyrant over 40 years, and that shows in his three books.
David didn’t write Psalms, nor did Solomon write Proverbs or Songs.
The authorship have been respectively ascribed to David and Solomon, but attributions doesn’t mean actual authorship.
There are no early version of Psalms, Proverbs or Songs that can be dated to the 10th century BCE.
The only things found written in the 10th century BCE, are some inscriptions on the Zayit Stone and the Gezer Calendar. Neither of them mention any name of any king.
It is the same with the Torah or the Pentateuch, the books supposedly written by Moses himself, except that we have no literary evidences that any of these writings existed in the Late Bronze Age.
The alleged authorship is what people call “attribution”. Attribution is where people give names to texts they didn’t write.
The four canonical gospels were written anonymously. Names, ie Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were “ascribed” to these gospels by the church of the 2nd century CE.