Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
That ought to make an interesting list.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
"43 Alumni for Biden"
- Thread starter sun rise
- Start date
According to one news report, we won't find out soon unless there's a leak. I'm not thrilled by this game playing but it's a legal game.
By announcing its formation on July 1, the group will effectively avoid disclosing its donors until mid-October, less than three weeks before the election.
Had it announced the day before, it would have had to file a list of donors with the Federal Election Commission by mid-July.
Hundreds Of Former Bush Officials Unite To Endorse Joe Biden
Mitty
Active Member
But surely there is someone out of 320 million people who could do the job better than a couple of geriatrics who might not even last the distance.
I know several people I think would be good.
The problem is that they aren't interested in descending into the cesspool of modern, media driven, partisan politics.
Tom
I'm going to go with Jorgensen and Cohen. However, I'm really just guessing, without any clear signs evident in your signature.
Not just that (though that is valid).
Presidential candidates have to be financially viable to a very high level. It's a major problem with the system, both at the point of the election, and really year around to be honest.
It negatively impacts on both sides of politics AND limits the ability of a substantial third party emerging.
Altfish
Veteran Member
Do you really think that Trump has more brains than Biden? Wow!
I don't believe the polls because they've been so wrong in the past. Most of these endorsers are unknowns, so really they have no influence. They're were appointed desk surfers, no much clout outside of with the government people who stand around smelling each other's farts.
The will of the people outside of this forum is very anti-Democrat. They like their police and don't care about the outrage of the zoomers. At this juncture, it's not that I like Trump's actions, but rather the Democrats conflict with my spiritual beliefs. I simply have no use for Marxism or Intersectional worldviews.
tytlyf
Not Religious
Trump is so bad he scared Rev off.
tytlyf
Not Religious
Trump told everyone he's smarter, so that's all the proof that's needed.
Someone ate a good breakfast!
For a random guess, it's pretty good.
I trust polls to measure what they measure.
And they do bear some relationship to how people vote.
But they aren't gospel.
As my wife has learnt, the more she makes the answer bleedingly obvious, the better my ability to work out the right answer.
These polls notoriously under-poll non-college degree working men and women who represent a huge portion of the people who actually show up to the polls. They don't even know how to get to these people because they're too damn busy. So, what they show is largely people who almost always vote liberal, and nothing else.
I've heard interviews with pollsters who are trying to overcome such inaccuracies.
They're trying but none have succeeded. Most of the honest ones will admit to that fact, and that's why there was a "Trump-slide" in 2016. Never seen a group of people be so damn wrong in my life. But, I predicted Trump as soon as he announced pretty much. Do you want my 2020? It's Trump. I've done this as a game for about 20 years, and the only election I really couldn't predict was Bush Vs. Kerry, because I saw them as equally worthless. Apparently, the voters agreed.
averageJOE
zombie
Corruption and incompetence is found on both sides of the aisle...so vote for the corruption and incompetence with a "D" by their name because...Trump.
I make no predictions....except for Jorgensen's loss.They're trying but none have succeeded. Most of the honest ones will admit to that fact, and that's why there was a "Trump-slide" in 2016. Never seen a group of people be so damn wrong in my life. But, I predicted Trump as soon as he announced pretty much. Do you want my 2020? It's Trump. I've done this as a game for about 20 years, and the only election I really couldn't predict was Bush Vs. Kerry, because I saw them as equally worthless. Apparently, the voters agreed.