amorphous_constellation
Well-Known Member
I often wish the human species wasn't quite so prone to believing irrational things. It's not always a good thing...
Another fine example of freedom of religion being allowed too much freedom, so much that we say "oh well, it's religion," while under any other circumstance we call it criminal or mentally ill behavior.
Very, very broad statements are being made here, I think. I'd like to point out that any freedom does not stretch on forever without it coming into conflict with rationality. I think that much crime could be eliminated at the cost of freedom, but the problem is clearly that great freedoms do not correlate absolutely with crime. If they did, we'd be living in quite a different world.
For example, a village might have someone that's pretty weird with odd habits and beliefs, but that person never would hurt anyone. Well, they are quite freely living away, and we might determine they seem pretty irrational. Well society can't just come out and jail that person, or medicate them, or institutionalize them against their will. That's because our sense of ethical freedom trumps our sense of rational uniformity, because great freedom doesn't always mean great crime.
Is it rational evangelicalhumanist, to lock up all those whom rationality deems as mentally ill? Didn't they have more broad criteria to institutionalize people before the 60's, for example? That's a pretty slippery slope, I'd guess. And to add further complexity to things, I'd argue that the human race hasn't once nailed down what standard rationality even is. So unless you have an actual argument to post, I'm not satisfied that you're proving anything
Last edited: