• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What’s your main reason for being a theist or an atheist?

Goodman John

Active Member
What if "god" is the Ultimate Rationalist? What if the test is of rational thinking? And what if all the people who reject rationality for faith, are the ones who fail the test?

So your "one in a million*" turns out you lose, and badly.

* I'd be interested in what sort of math you used, to compute those odds.. I think you are off by a factor of near infinity (if not actual infinity) -- against.

So what is Rational God's punishment for the irrational? Are we doomed to an eternity of rational logic with no possibility of a single irrational thought? Are we to be locked into a 1984-like situation where the Right Thoughts are the only approved ones? Or is the 1984 afterlife the GOOD one?

As for the 'one-in-a-million' term surely you can see it's meant figuratively and not literally.

In this situation, do Agnostics get at least a 50% on their test? What's their prize?
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
So what is Rational God's punishment for the irrational? Are we doomed to an eternity of rational logic with no possibility of a single irrational thought? Are we to be locked into a 1984-like situation where the Right Thoughts are the only approved ones? Or is the 1984 afterlife the GOOD one?.

How about oblivion? Or worse.... the actual "heaven" as envisioned by Bronze Age goat herders who did not know where the sun went at night... which to a rational mind, sounds like a literal hell...

As for the 'one-in-a-million' term surely you can see it's meant figuratively and not literally..

How do you figure even a figurative chance? Infinity to one is still zero.

In this situation, do Agnostics get at least a 50% on their test? What's their prize?

Agnostic isn't some hypothetical "half way thing" between being an atheist or a theist; so is the agnostic rational? Or irrational?

I have encountered agnostic theists, and agnostic atheists... it's not mutually exclusive.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
But as I grew up, I eventually realized a pattern: Every answer/response from god?

Was absolute silence. Or to put it another way? A big, fat 'NO!'

That's when I begin to realize all the bible promises were lies. If some of the fundamental promises of the (supposedly) #1 Book On God were lies? How reliable was the rest? So I begin to really study the bible... and the more I found out? The uglier it became....
I do not know where in the Bible it says that God will answer prayers. I guess it must say that somewhere because my ex-Christian friends all say it does. It should not say that because it is very misleading. God ONLY answers prayers when He sees fit to answer them, and often the answer we get is a "no" to what we asked for and instead we get another answer....

The other thing is that we can NEVER prove that God answered any prayer, we can only surmise, because whatever happened could have been a coincidence.

I call it the "naive believer syndrome" when I hear Christians say that God did this and God did that in their lives, often in answer to their prayers.... NOBODY can ever know what God did or is doing at any time...

That said, I think that if we have faith we do get guidance from God, although I could never prove it. I do not normally say any prayers asking for stuff but sometimes when I get to the end of my rope, I give God what for, I scream and yell at Him. Almost always, I get an answer after that, sometimes shortly thereafter and sometimes the next day. I cannot prove it was God but I have NO other explanation as to how a certain thought came into my head out of the blue.

Sometimes I think God needs a hearing aid or He has His cell turned off.... On the other hand, Abdu'l-Baha, the son of Baha'u'llah, said that God answers all prayers that are "urgent." It is just that God is the one who decides if they are urgent or not, we don't get to decide. I used to pray for things I thought were urgent and I never got an answer. Only much later did I realize how petty those things were, and that I did not even need them.

I finally threw up my hands and decided that whatever will be will be and I have no control over the situation. All I can do is my best and hope for the best outcome. Sometimes it is tragic and I just have to accept it as part of this sordid life. However, the difference now is that I know God has my back, even though I still get pissed off at Him sometimes. :mad: It is okay to get angry at God, it does not hurt God, nobody can hurt God. Besides that, God knows our hearts so God knows I am not really angry, except in that given moment.

That said, I still have lots of things to work out with God, and if I do not do that in this life, hopefully I will still be able to do it in the afterlife. I am anything but finished with this God stuff.... :rolleyes:

I feel your pain because I have spent almost all my free time for the last seven years posting to ex-Christian atheists on other forums, almost all of whom have been hurt by Christianity and the Bible. Many of them have recovered but some haven't, and I don't know if they ever will. Still, I continue to post to them about God because they want to talk about god. They have become friends now and a couple of them now say they believe that God exists, just not the Bible God. :eek:

Nice talking with you Bob, as usual. I always like talking to atheists, even though they get after me about my beliefs. That is understandable. :)
 

Goodman John

Active Member
For Pascal's Wager to really have any meaning we have to assume- as Pascal did- that only one God is in play. For him, that was the Christian God. But the Wager works, regardless of what deity is in the driver's seat, as long as only that deity is considered to have any power.

Where it all goes south is when we consider the possibility of the existence of multiple gods. How many are there, and do they interact with one another and if so, how? If each 'god' only has power over his or her own followers then Pascal is as good as any 'test'. If, on the other hand, ALL the gods affect ALL of us then we've got a much larger problem with Pascal and it devolves into- as I used the term- a 'one-in-a-million' shot at getting it right.

Then again, in thinking about it, Pascal really doesn't apply to my personal belief system in such stark terms as Cake or Fiery Death. As I believe this world IS Hell, that option is already accounted for and the only effect of me 'getting it wrong' (ie, my soul not being released to God) is a repeat performance in which my spirit is placed into another body for another round until it's released. If I DO 'get it right' I win the Big Prize and head for Paradise- if I don't, I'm right back here for another go; that's about it. As long as I'm not late for the Last Bus to Paradise, in the larger scheme of things the transmigration of my soul isn't a total loss; at least it gets another chance at redemption. The only other possibility is that I'm completely wrong, and if Pascal holds true and there's nothing afterward, then the worst I've done is tried to lead a good life.

You know the line...

article-2403742-1B7EC094000005DC-760_634x311.jpg
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
And that makes it all perfect
Oh no, nothing is perfect, especially not my life. :eek:

Back in the days when I used to attend 12 step meetings we had a saying -- "progress, not perfection." I never forgot that. I can only try to make progress, I will never be perfect in everything I say or do, I will make many mistakes. The important thing is that I can recognize them and admit to them and try to correct them if I can. It is nice when I can correct them because some of them I cannot go back and correct, I just have to deal with the aftermath. :(
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Nope. You cannot have "god" without invoking "magic". That's rather how god's have to work-- by magic. They magically *poof* things into being, or magically *poof* huge tracts of ... water into being, or magically *poof* their Special Favorite Spokes-Weenies.

It's Magic all the way down, with gods....
Okay, now that you explained what you mean by magic, I understand and I agree. :)
 

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
For Pascal's Wager to really have any meaning we have to assume- as Pascal did- that only one God is in play. For him, that was the Christian God. But the Wager works, regardless of what deity is in the driver's seat, as long as only that deity is considered to have any power.

No, it doesn't. If the only god doesn't like you believing in any of the others (the false gods of other religions), you're just as doomed as an atheist if you pick the wrong one. Also, if the god isn't the god of any of the religions, and is using some other criterion entirely (such as, for example, damning everybody who was stupid enough to believe in a god despite it carefully concealing itself), it's anybody's guess....
 

Goodman John

Active Member
How do you figure even a figurative chance? Infinity to one is still zero.

No, zero chance is zero chance. Even if there are an infinite number of possible answers, but only one of them is right, picking one of them is better than picking none at all.

Now, whether that 'one-in-infinity' choice is worth it to the individual is for them to decide. Others may deride your choice, but in the end we are our own responsibility and another person's view or opinion has absolutely no bearing on the validity of your beliefs.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Then .... WHY did this No-Needs, Perfect Being .... suddenly decide he needed people? And he magically *poofed* them into being?

WHY? If he did not have any needs? He would never have created humans in the first place!

Your contradiction proves gods are not real.
That is a good question and I have the perfect answer for you Bob...

God did not NEED humans, God WANTED humans. In other words, God could have gotten along just fine without us, but God wanted us because God wanted someone to Love. He also wanted us to Love Him, but God does not need our Love, He just wants our Love. The reason God wants us to Love Him is for our own benefit, not for His benefit, since God is fully self-sufficient and has no needs.

The Hidden Words below sum up God's position quite well. #5 explains that if we do not Love God, God's Love cannot reach us. The reason is that God never forces His Love upon us, He wants it to be given to Him freely, by our own choice:

3: O SON OF MAN! Veiled in My immemorial being and in the ancient eternity of My essence, I knew My love for thee; therefore I created thee, have engraved on thee Mine image and revealed to thee My beauty.

4: O SON OF MAN! I loved thy creation, hence I created thee. Wherefore, do thou love Me, that I may name thy name and fill thy soul with the spirit of life.”

5: O SON OF BEING! Love Me, that I may love thee. If thou lovest Me not, My love can in no wise reach thee. Know this, O servant.

The Hidden Words of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 4
 

Goodman John

Active Member
No, it doesn't. If the only god doesn't like you believing in any of the others (the false gods of other religions), you're just as doomed as an atheist if you pick the wrong one. Also, if the god isn't the god of any of the religions, and is using some other criterion entirely (such as, for example, damning everybody who was stupid enough to believe in a god despite it carefully concealing itself), it's anybody's guess....

And that's the beauty of discourse; one can 'what if' a subject all day long (or for a lifetime) and still not arrive at a universally satisfactory answer.
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
No, zero chance is zero chance. Even if there are an infinite number of possible answers, but only one of them is right, picking one of them is better than picking none at all.

Now, whether that 'one-in-infinity' choice is worth it to the individual is for them to decide. Others may deride your choice, but in the end we are our own responsibility and another person's view or opinion has absolutely no bearing on the validity of your beliefs.

Okay, I get what you are saying-- but I disagree the assumption that pick one is better than pick none.

What if the Ultimate Creator is OCD about rationality? In which case picking any is worse than picking none.

Since this is all entirely hypothetical? We may use any scenario we are able to think of-- and each is just as likely as the next.

What if the Universe was created by Sock-Eating Pixies? And they get upset if you believe in non-pixie gods...
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
That is a good question and I have the perfect answer for you Bob...

God did not NEED humans, God WANTED humans. In other words, God could have gotten along just fine without us, but God wanted us because God wanted someone to Love. He also wanted us to Love Him, but God does not need our Love, He just wants our Love. The reason God wants us to Love Him is for our own benefit, not for His benefit, since God is fully self-sufficient and has no needs.

The Hidden Words below sum up God's position quite well. #5 explains that if we do not Love God, God's Love cannot reach us. The reason is that God never forces His Love upon us, He wants it to be given to Him freely, by our own choice:

3: O SON OF MAN! Veiled in My immemorial being and in the ancient eternity of My essence, I knew My love for thee; therefore I created thee, have engraved on thee Mine image and revealed to thee My beauty.

4: O SON OF MAN! I loved thy creation, hence I created thee. Wherefore, do thou love Me, that I may name thy name and fill thy soul with the spirit of life.”

5: O SON OF BEING! Love Me, that I may love thee. If thou lovest Me not, My love can in no wise reach thee. Know this, O servant.

The Hidden Words of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 4

Wanting is a form of NEED. And is contrary to a perfect god....

Oh well, nice try though.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Okay, I get what you are saying-- but I disagree the assumption that pick one is better than pick none...
Imo, it is better to pick none than to pick the wrong one.
The reason I say that is because if you pick the wrong one, you can get stuck with him forever.

By contrast, if you pick none, there is still a chance that the right one will show up eventually and you can pick him.

But let's say the right one shows up and you already picked one. You are not likely to recognize the right one if you are convinced you already have the right one, even though he is the wrong one. :D
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Wanting is a form of NEED. And is contrary to a perfect god....

Oh well, nice try though.
No Bob, a want is not a need.
I might want a new Mercedes but I do not need a new Mercedes because I have two old Hondas in the driveway. :)

So why do you think wanting is contrary to a perfect God, keeping in mind that God always GETS what He WANTS?
 

Nyingjé Tso

Tänpa Yungdrung zhab pä tän gyur jig
Vanakkam

Strange, repeated experiences that came true in life.

I didn't "become" a theist, rather realized what I already was. It was like being invited to stay in a house by a friend... So I just stayed.

But it is all personal expériences. I would never put them as a général Universal truth or as "the only true way(tm)".

It's just my path. Everyone has their, it's better, more diverse and colorful this way.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
My main reason for being an atheist is that I have no reason to be a theist. God beliefs answer no questions or provide any useful information, being a skeptic I require a reason before believing, and religion meets no unmet need.

I returned to atheism after about a decade as a Christian for these reasons. The religion wasn't serving any useful purpose, and it became clear to me that I had misunderstood my euphoric experiences that came in the early years, but disappeared when I returned home after a military discharge, visited several other dead congregations, and finally realized that what I was interpreting as the Holy Spirit was just my own mind successfully aroused by a very charismatic pastor. I could see in those other congregations that this religion wasn't keeping its promises in this life, so why should I believe its promises for an afterlife?

I also got married during that decade based on those feelings. I believed that the Holy Spirit had selected my future wife based on one of those euphoric experiences. Worst mistake of my life. We really weren't compatible. It was as if I picked somebody at random. I guess I did.

Life got better eliminating magical and faith-based thinking, and returning strictly to rigorous reason and evidence-based methods for determining what is true about the world. Incidentally, I'm remarried, chose her the right way - by getting to know her and making an evidence-based choice that time. We're coming up on our 29th anniversary soon.

there’s zero evidence outside of personal experience for atheism too

I'll just reaffirm here what others have already said a few times. Atheism requires no evidence. It's merely the "no" answer to the question whether one believes in a god or gods, theism being the "yes" answer. I expect the theist to give me a reason to believe in gods, but I have no duty to defend the fact that I am unconvinced.

My atheism is just like my avampirism and aleprechaunism. I don't believe in gods because I have no reason to. And none of them represent existential claims about reality, nor define my worldview beyond the fact that it contains no gods, vampires, or leprechauns.

The claim that God or gods exist as opposed to the claim that no God or god exists are opposing points of view.

But not comprehensive. I'm an agnostic atheist, and hold neither of those positions. Likewise with agnostic theists.

I accept there are difficulties and controversies in defining atheism reflecting in part a spectrum or range of beliefs.

As you have been told on this thread, there is no range of beliefs or system of beliefs that define atheism. There are many different kinds of atheists, and not all atheistic worldviews are rational. Astrology removes gods from the universe and is thus atheistic, but it's still irrational and not evidence-based, which of course is why it's useless. Stalinism might be another atheistic alternative to secular humanism, which sharply condemns brutal, totalitarian regimes. The Secular humanist, Stalinist, and astrologer might have nothing else in common in their worldviews than their lack of a god belief.

The only beliefs involved in my atheism are that that nothing should be believed without adequate supporting evidence, and that the evidence offered to date for gods is unconvincing. Every other belief I have derives from that rational, skeptical, empirical perspective, not from atheism. Nor avampirism.

I appreciate atheism isn’t a religion but it seems clearly a belief and an important part of one’s worldview.

Do you still think that after reading what I just wrote? Is your aleprechaunism (I'm presuming that you're an aleprechaunist) an important part of your worldview? Why is this point so difficult to convey?

most people don’t believe in unicorns whereas most people believe in God or gods. Why do you think that is?

For the same reason that kids raised in the Santa tradition believe in Santa, the difference being that their parents eventually told them that Santa was mythical. Those same kids would also believe in unicorns if brought up to do so.

A big reason that religion and god-beliefs are more universal in human belief systems is that unicorns don't have institutions to spread the belief in unicorns. They didn't have Emperors and kings sending out armies of Roman legions, Crusaders, and Conquistadores to spread unicorn belief, because unicorn belief was of no value to them, but religion was. Where are the unicorn missions, or the unicorn scriptures being printed and given away free of charge to anybody that will accept them on faith?

It’s great to hear all the reasons God can’t and doesn’t exist

If "God" refers to the god of Abraham, that god can be ruled out with pure reason the way that married bachelors can. Somebody screwed the pooch claiming that their god was omniscient, but also possessed and granted free will. They didn't think that through, which is how we can tell that the scripture writers were just giving their own very human opinions.

One aspect of my God believe is that He is an unknowable essence so the best way we come to know Him is through His Chosen Messengers or Manifestations

I find that contradictory. If the god is unknowable to me, it is unknowable to other humans. The willingness to trust and believe such other humans is an example of the kind of thinking I'm no longer willing to engage in - faith-based thought.

I suspect once you have had an experience of being a genuine theist, you wouldn’t go back to atheism.

I did. Of course, for many theists, that just means I was never a genuine theist. If so, that definition excludes all of those able to burrow out of religion. By definition, such people had weak faith. I see them differently. I'm one. The religion failed. It was brave and difficult to shed it, but it was the best thing for me. Subsequent personal history supports that claim. I am very content with my life these last few decades as a secular humanist.

The example set by the and Teachers of the Abrahamic Faiths is evidence for the existence of the God of Abraham.

Not to me. There is no human being whose life suggests to me that there is a god. And of course, the teachers of the Abrahamic faiths include all of its adherents, which is not a very flattering crowd to be included amongst. I learned as much about Christianity from teachers like the Palins and Duggars as I did from any other Christians.

I believe God is the most hidden of the hidden, and the most manifest of the manifest

That's the kind of thinking I find commonplace in religion, but that I can't use. Does that mean anything?

My biggest concern is it creates an us and them divide between theists and atheists.

That comes from the theists. In my world, the Christian West, it comes right out of their Bibles. This is the filth and hate speech that people reading the Bible are taught :

[1] "The fool says in his heart,'There is no God.' They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good" - Psalm 14:1

[2] "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone, and all and the enemy of a good god." - Revelation 21:8

[3]"Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?"- 2 Corinthians 6:14

[4] Who is the liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ." - 1 John 2:22

[5] "Whoever is not with me is against me" - Luke 11:23

[6] “Anyone who does not provide for their relatives, and especially for their own household, has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.” - 1 Timothy 5:8

[7] "They are puzzled that you do not continue running with them in the same decadent course of debauchery, so they speak abusively of you" – 1 Peter 4:4

This Bible calls unbelievers like me lying, corrupt, vile, wicked, abominable, decadent, debauched, godless vessels of darkness in the service of evil, not one of whom does any good, fit to be shunned and to be burned alive forever as enemies of a good god, and the moral equivalent of murderers and whoremongers.

Drop dead, Christianity, and do the world a favor. Atheists don't need or deserve this.don't need this.

My wife had a similar experience with her flat mate before we married. They had been close friends then her flat mate converted to a rather fundamentalist version of Christianity and started obsessing about how her non Christian friends were all going to hell. They went from being best friends to progressively more distant.

And there is the divisiveness of religion. It's not due to secular humanists. Once again, eff those people. They're not my fellow anythings. May they please leave the earth and make it a better place.
 
Top