• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Would sharks and T Rex buried together lean toward the flood?

tas8831

tas8831

Well-Known Member
Thief said:
only if God was taking out T Rex along with all the 'bad' humans
Click to expand...
All humans were bad but 8. Seems like the system was a pretty crappy one such that nearly all humans ended up being bad. To include infants and such.
 
tas8831

tas8831

Well-Known Member
Audie said:
Do you ever pause to reflect on how remarkable
it is that you, who have never studied any of
the subject matter still somehow know more than
any researcher on earth?
Click to expand...

But he has patents! PATENTS!

How can he be wrong about anything?????
 
Thief

Thief

Rogue Theologian
tas8831 said:
All humans were bad but 8. Seems like the system was a pretty crappy one such that nearly all humans ended up being bad. To include infants and such.
Click to expand...
but if T Rex was up and about....
he must have been really......really bad
 
sooda

sooda

Veteran Member
tas8831 said:
All humans were bad but 8. Seems like the system was a pretty crappy one such that nearly all humans ended up being bad. To include infants and such.
Click to expand...

When the Gods of Sumer flooded the world and destroyed humankind a bit earlier the reason was that they were NOISY.
 
sealchan

sealchan

Well-Known Member
whirlingmerc said:
Hell Creek rock formation in Montana has both shark and T Rex fossils.
Seems to lean toward rather than against the Noah epic.

Data reported in the Journal of Paleontology pp1-19, 21 Jan 2019

What say you?
Click to expand...

This is so typical...take an article that has nothing to do with demonstrating a creationist point and misinterpret it to do so.

Why would sharks die in a worldwide flood?
 
Audie

Audie

Veteran Member
sealchan said:
Why would sharks be killed by a worldwide flood?
Click to expand...

You do know that fresh water organisms
need fresh water, marine ones need fresh water, and
intertidal organisms need to have the tide?
And that none of them would get what they need
in this "flood"?
 
C

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Audie said:
You do know that fresh water organisms
need fresh water, marine ones need fresh water, and
intertidal organisms need to have the tide?
And that none of them would get what they need
in this "flood"?
Click to expand...
Unless, of course, God magically changed them for awhile, like He put all the elephants and such to sleep aboard the Ark:rolleyes:

Once you've separated your beliefs from evidence and reason you might believe almost anything.

Tom
 
Audie

Audie

Veteran Member
sealchan said:
What about a beach or an estuary?
Click to expand...

Both dinosaurs and "mammals" are typicall
terrestrial.

What our hero omits is from his mention of "mammals"
is that there are zero fossils of anything resembling a
modern mammal. Just little multituberculates and so forth.

Not a dog, cat, horse, cow, nor yet a monkey, a kangaroo,
a sea cow, a possum, a rabbit or a rat. None of the mammals
living today are represented. Zero. Ever. At any dinosaur
site. Now inconvenient. How carefully ignored.
 
Audie

Audie

Veteran Member
columbus said:
Unless, of course, God magically changed them for awhile, like He put all the elephants and such to sleep aboard the Ark:rolleyes:

Once you've separated your beliefs from evidence and reason you might believe almost anything.

Tom
Click to expand...

Oh rats, I am again outmaneuvered by the creos,
and so easily. God magiced them. Of course.
 
tas8831

tas8831

Well-Known Member
And not having been sufficiently pwned in this thread, the engineer creationist has tottered off to make a couple more similar threads, just as vacuous in nature, and surely just as likely to be, in effect, post and runs...
 
Audie

Audie

Veteran Member
Audie said:
It could be, but the particular circumstances
would need to be examined. Land animals are
commonly washed down rivers and into
bays and estuaries; storm tides will strand
marine creatures inland.

What is most important though-and please
make an effort here- is that evidence "consistent
with" is not proof.

Your suspect is a tall black man. The victim
said it was a tall black man did it!

So far, we have consistent evidence.

Now, as it turns out later, the tall black man
is a bank president who was at a meeting
in St. Louis when the purse snatching was
in N. Omaha.

So the "consistent evidence" on one detail is
not merely insufficient, but the theory that he
did it is disproved. Impossible.

In the case of "flood" there is a huge abundance
of such disproof, but the existence of polar
ice deeply predating any possible flood is
disproof of any hypothesis that land / sea
creature fossilized near eachother "leans
toward " flood.

Of more interest here is why you persist in
your belief in "flood" and seek out things that
you think might lean somewhere. (Without
of course, studying the relevant facts to see if
it even is consistent with your hypothesis)

Why must you try to bring in more
"evidence" ( look! Our suspect wears glasses!
So did the perp!!) when the hypothesis has
been irrefutably disproved?

So, could you maybe explain what is really
going on with your endless effort to salvage
the flood hypothesis?
Click to expand...

Well Hockey, as for your "optimistic", yeah, it
really is not too likely that there will be any
thought or response from he to whom my
post was addressed. You could try to answer it
yourself, of course. :D
 
Last edited:
Audie

Audie

Veteran Member
tas8831 said:
And not having been sufficiently pwned in this thread, the engineer creationist has tottered off to make a couple more similar threads, just as vacuous in nature, and surely just as likely to be, in effect, post and runs...
Click to expand...

Makes ya think of Charlie Brown, Lucy and the football.
 
Hockeycowboy

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
Audie said:
......when the hypothesis has
been irrefutably disproved?
Click to expand...

Lol! A young Earth has been debunked.

The Flood hasnt. (Why does every skeptic ignore the modern "30-5-3 ratio" of the Ark's proportions? It sure ain't the "120-sq.-cubit" ark in the Epic of Gilgamesh!)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top