Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Thank you for your reply.
What seems logical without God, is logical when God enters the picture.
That is because you are using language too loosely. I can state that I am extremely sure -- based on my personal observations of the universe and how things work in it, combined with my knowledge of science, and my knowledge of human nature and how we think and solve problems -- that there is no God. And I can state, at the same time, that I cannot be totally categorical about that, because the fact is I do not know everything.
Because while most people say the "really want peace," what they actually MEAN is that they "really want peace, so long as it's on my terms."
Very few people actually believe those stories are historically factual, though, even among theists. They have simply "suspend disbelief" as we all do with all kinds of literary fiction, for the sake of the conceptual rewards that such fiction offers us. And people wanting the law of the land to reflect their values is commonplace among a great many of us, theists and non-theists, alike. So even though I may not agree with how others have chosen to interpret and value the insights of the literature they read, including religious myth, I see no basis upon which to presume to 'correct' them. Also, I don't see the value in trying to challenge people who reject both reason or evidence as their criteria for conceptualizing reality. What do you propose to challenge them, with? I understand your thinking that they are wrong to assume that myths are reality, but I don't see how you can stop them from doing so.
It says so right at the beginning of the film! And I assume in the beginning of the book as well.
Oh, I'd bet someone out there is. There are people still insisting that the world is a flat disc. With 7 billion of us on the planet, there are bound to be a few. And if you find them, you won't be able to change their minds, either. But this is beside the point. The majority of NORMAL humans do not confuse myth with reality. They are capable of interpreting myth to reveal truths about reality that are deeper and more meaningful to them than the physics of it.
Confusing fiction with reality is problematic, I agree. But it's not a particularly religious problem. It's a human problem.
Well, I think you should get over it, because you aren't going to stop them, or change their minds using evidence or reason, they've already rejected that. And they have a right to believe whatever they want, anyway.
Only a small fraction of religious expression does this. Yet you seem to be characterizing all religious expression as similarly dogmatic and irrational. This is the very definition of an unfair and irrational bias.
Very few people are actually insisting on this. And you are not in charge of what other people believe. Your moral values are your own, as are everyone else's. How do you propose to protect your rights when you are insisting on denying theirs? This is a human dilemma that transcends religion by a long way. One that mankind is still struggling to work out.
Again, you can't seem to see past your anti-religious bias. ALL organized institutions that accumulate great wealth and power become corrupted by it. Their proclaimed ideology and purpose is pretty much irrelevant when their behavior is clearly selfish and predatory.
However, if they really wanted peace on God's terms aka Golden Rule, then there would be Peace on Earth.
And that rule (phrased my own way, of course, as "do not do to others what you would not have done to yourself") is one that I, who do believe in God, live by. And strangely, I'm at peace with everyone, and uninterested in making them into characters in my personal story.