SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
LOL You're psychologically projecting.Apparently, in a Me Too setting, a man is guilty anytime a woman imputes a crime against them. That is going to make women a hot potato, that no one will go around. Your husband must be walking on eggshells. A hell of a life for him.
I'm sorry your life is so miserable that you have to blame women for it.
My husband and I have been quite happy for 24 years now. Thank you. He knows that I have been sexually assaulted and have had debilitating panic attacks for the last 2 decades because of it, and he encourages and supports me and helps me through it. He would never and has never sexually assaulted anyone, nor been accused of it. Despite your sexist beliefs, women don't make up sexual assaults all the time. In fact, we don't report them as much as we should, for myriad reasons given to you earlier, which I'm sure you didn't bother reading. Why learn anything when you can remain stagnant and wallow in your own ignorance, amirite? Good times.
And yet evidence was presented and Trump was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation in a court of law. The man is guilty.As for a New York Court, that votes generally 2:1 Democratic, and lives under a Me Too umbrella, no real evidence is necessary to convict a man charged by a woman.
Nope, it's called defamation. Trump has been found liable for doing it. Twice now in this one case.As for convicting Trump of disparaging E. Carroll of being crazy, well, in most places you can't be convicted for telling the truth.
Trump and his co-conspirators are the only ones who have tried to rig an election. The last one.As time marches on, and the media and the elite experts are more or less discredited, a lot of New Yorkers are realizing that Trump is their ally and not their enemy, and any political judicial war against him may not succeed, even in a historically democratic setting. The democrats will probably have to set up something of a black swan event to try and rig any election
Your attempt to transfer his guilt to the Democrats is duly noted though.
Trump is currently sleeping through his criminal proceeding in New York. Good start for him, eh? LOL, because I am thinking their criminal proceedings are not going to wind up as they wish. E. Carrroll has her mice, cat, and dog, but what will you have when the Me Too crowd undermine their own platform?
LOL You think he can sue her for saying "rape was not sexual?" How?If she is sued by Trump, with regard to her video saying the rape was not sexual, will likely cost her around 80 million dollars, plus attorney fees.
So how come he hasn't sued her yet?
Oh, it's been determined in a court of law that there was, in fact, an interaction. It's been adjudicated. You don't get to say there wasn't.Not that there was any interaction to start with.
Which was one of the points of my post that you ignored and doubled down on instead.
This post was in response to, "1. Innocent until proven guilty. Not a criminal until convicted.
2. Trump found liable for fraud, sexual abuse and defamation in a civil court by judge and jury. Still innocent. Didn't do anything wrong at all. Witch hunt! It's all going to be reversed someday."
No where in your response did you come anywhere close to speaking to the point. You've just engaged in more woman bashing and repetition of your previous claims.