I did.Did you read the OP at least?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I did.Did you read the OP at least?
Perfect.I did.
Interesting.@Estro Felino Why don't you just check what the other side has to say about it:
Two hours of lies and delusions: Putin’s “sensational” interview with Tucker Carlson
On the night of February 9, Tucker Carlson released a two-hour interview with Vladimir Putin. The scandalous ex-Fox News host promised thorny questions to the dictator, which he claimed was his goal when he decided to fly to Moscow. — Ukrinform.www.ukrinform.net
I just need you to realize how unfortunate that sounds.I just need you guys to correct Putin's claims.
Do you know how many Wikipedia articles I wrote?I just need you to realize how unfortunate that sounds.
Have you read Russian invasion of Ukraine? (Of course not.)
Do you know how many Wikipedia articles I wrote?
Anyone can publish things on Wikipedia. It's not the Bible.
When I was younger. So many of them. In Italian. About historical characters and movies, mostly. Never about politics.Could you link us to the Wikipedia articles you've written?
When I was younger. So many of them. In Italian. About historical characters and movies, mostly. Never about politics.
"Willingly" and "clearly demonstrates"... That's your interpretation. If you are truly interested in facts you might want to be more careful with such judgements, just saying...The detail that they have willingly forgotten the Nordstream sabotage part, clearly demonstrates they know Putin is right.
I don't need articles or journalists."Willingly" and "clearly demonstrates"... That's your interpretation. If you are truly interested in facts you might want to be more careful with such judgements, just saying...
Which of your posts have 552 footnotes?Do you know how many Wikipedia articles I wrote?
Anyone can publish things on Wikipedia. It's not the Bible.
This is a joke.When I was younger. So many of them. In Italian. About historical characters and movies, mostly. Never about politics.
It turns out I wroteWhich of your posts have 552 footnotes?
You deride the Wikipedia entry while asking anonymous RF members for their input. And then you suggest that we should take you seriously because you wrote articles ...
This is a joke.
If you tell me "I speak Italian", I will.Can you link some for us?
This is in a way similar to the USA recently. Just 3 US soldiers died in an attack, I read, but the US reacted much more than proportionalI don't know if I can agree with the statement that he "had no other option than to invade." The option to not invade always exists
@Estro FelinoInteresting.
The detail that they have willingly forgotten the Nordstream sabotage part, clearly demonstrates they know Putin is right.
They have missed so many points by the way.
An interview of 2 hours and 5 minutes. I watched it all.
Because imperialism involves the application of territorial ambition, i.e empire building.How is that _not_ imperalism again? Even if we take form granted his rather dubious attempts at justification?
In the Christian texts there are two mechanisms for this: a metaphorical head wound and a consequence of idolatry.He's not wrong. The oppressors and evil people who support them can never see anything clearly.
I have no more questions.Because imperialism involves the application of territorial ambition, i.e empire building.
Putin is a corrupt dictator. He was never fully respected by the world but Russia was awarded the Olympics at Socci, and later hosted annual Formula One races. Putin’s invasion forced the economic powers of the world to end relationships with Russia. Putin invested so much into Socci and then ruined it. And for what?Enlighten me.
Correct Putin's errors.