I'm not really sure what you think qualifies you to have problems with any of this science. I haven't seen anything that indicates you understand it.Christmas aside, there are problems as I see it, with the validity of the classifications of species. And now I see some may believe that plants and animals did not necessarily stem from one incident by happenstance but perhaps by multitudinous incidents, some becoming plants like trees, and others becoming birds, fishes, gorillas, and perhaps lastly humans, considered I guess as "homo sapiens." So again -- hope you have a good evening.
That would be the first step in any challenge to science. Understand the science you are challenging. An athlete has to train to approach their challenges. In this area, you have to train your mind by educating yourself on the science that you are uncomfortable with.
People don't just decide they are going to be a world class sprinter or distance runner and then go out and win every race having never before practiced or competed.
Nothing in science is set in stone. Science is not a belief system. It is not followed as a religion. It is not changed arbitrarily based on prevailing belief. If someone has a new or different idea, that person is not disfellowshipped from science. If a compelling argument based on the evidence is put out there to challenge current understanding, views, positions, etc. it will fail or prevail on its merits and might become accepted as the best explanation so far determined. But for well-established areas of science like classification and evolution, the understanding and the evidence is going to have to be tremendous.
There must be a sound reason to challenge these things that is more than "my faith group tells me science is wrong, therefore I reject science".