You dun broke me irony meter.What's stupid is being disingenuous and deliberately obtuse.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You dun broke me irony meter.What's stupid is being disingenuous and deliberately obtuse.
A Gish Gallop as I understand it is to ask a series of different questions covering a broad area so the person can not possibly respond to so many different topics.I addressed a claim by a poster. You joined
in, & launched a barrage of questions at me,
but without answering mine. This resembled
a Gish Gallop. I'll explore my question first.
They have gone for more cringe material by the leftest activist 'intellectuals' of the future.Apparently the number of segments on Fox News dealing with crime has dropped significantly lately.
View attachment 68910
I wonder what could have happened? Has the crime suddenly dropped in the U.S.? Why would the number for segments rise throughout the fall, and then suddenly drop like that? I can’t think of anything that could have happened around the first week of November that would change the programming on Fox?
Can anyone shed some light on this mystery?
Is that because those topics are more important and of more interest to their audience than crime?They have gone for more cringe material by the leftest activist 'intellectuals' of the future.
Gluing hands to pavement, throwing gook on Picasso paintings, throwing powder on auto displays breathing in the dust cloud. That sort of thing.
Who knew asking a question about a confusingThey’re so blinded they don’t even see the stupidity of their own responses.
I think its mixing the material. Crime is just so yesterday methinks.Is that because those topics are more important and of more interest to their audience than crime?
Delightful. Thank you for your contribution.Crime is just so yesterday methinks.
I think that's how they view things. Ratings. Not subject.Delightful. Thank you for your contribution.
Perhaps it was broken beforehand.You dun broke me irony meter.
The scaremongering came before the election, not after, so obviously not the drop in coverage.You posted this answer to the OP's questions.
Manipulating voters with scaremongering?
And the timing, is that just random? Can you think of anything that happened the beginning of November that might have had an effect on this particular subject change? Anything that happened around, lets say, the 8th of November? Anything? Or anything that was going on in the lead-up to this sudden "subject change"?I think that's how they view things. Ratings. Not subject.
Pretty much all media these days.
Apparently the number of segments on Fox News dealing with crime has dropped significantly lately.
View attachment 68910
I wonder what could have happened? Has the crime suddenly dropped in the U.S.? Why would the number for segments rise throughout the fall, and then suddenly drop like that? I can’t think of anything that could have happened around the first week of November that would change the programming on Fox?
Can anyone shed some light on this mystery?
Nothing I can think of atm.And the timing, is that just random? Can you think of anything that happened the beginning of November that might have had an effect on this particular subject change? Anything that happened around, lets say, the 8th of November? Anything?
Allrightieo. Thanks for your contribution.Nothing I can think of atm.
I think the point was that the increased crime reporting before the election was scare mongering. Once the election happened the crime reporting rates dropped precipitously.How is reduced crime reporting "scaremongering"?
See...it's not so hard to give anPerhaps it was broken beforehand.
The scaremongering came before the election, not after, so obviously not the drop in coverage.
If not that then why the abrupt shift in focus?
See post #35.I think the point was that the increased crime reporting before the election was scare mongering. Once the election happened the crime reporting rates dropped precipitously.
Oh, how shocking! They wouldn't, would they?Manipulating voters with scaremongering?
I noticed that you couldn't answer my question.
Who's the dumb one now, Rover.
I'd say it's the same reason there's a flood in Republican campaign adds ran around here just before the election that are all doom and gloom and telling us about how bad crime is and will get if Dems are voted out.So if Fox News coverage of crime recently is relatively
less than in the past, then this is "scaremongering", eh.
How so?