• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Shroud of Turin is from first AD.

Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
ElishaElijah said:
@Subduction Zone , @Sheldon
Both of you have made proselytizing comments to me yet haven’t explained how they are so were they or were they not?
Click to expand...
What "proselytizing" comments are you talking about?

I tend to deal with concepts that are well supported by evidence. Religious beliefs cannot be well supported by evidence. But I would be glad to explain any comments of mine that you have questions about.
 
Sheldon

Sheldon

Veteran Member
ElishaElijah said:
You did answer from someone else’s post so follow along or don’t but that’s about it on that. Answering your posts is optional because most of the time I don’t see the point of even considering them.
Click to expand...
Then why respond at all? I gave an expansive post, and explained how one of your earlier responses had failed to address any of the post you were responding to there, then you did the same thing with just a post number that had no relevance. The point of course would be to debate, and beyond that to examine your arguments alongside opposing ones to test their validity. So yes I can see why that is lost on you, since closed minded blind faith wouldn't need that, which does rather beg the question why you're in a debate forum.
 
Sheldon

Sheldon

Veteran Member
ElishaElijah said:
@Subduction Zone , @Sheldon
Both of you have made proselytizing comments to me yet haven’t explained how they are so were they or were they not? This is an important question for you both to answer but not for me really.
Click to expand...

Look the word up yourself in any dictionary, I am done spoon feeding basic facts to you, since you don't even do me the courtesy of addressing what I post most of the time.

ElishaElijah said: ↑
Answering your posts is optional
Click to expand...

Proper debate involves reciprocity, and if you can't be bothered, I will reply as and when I am minded to. Perhaps a biblical reference will help you grasp where you're going here, you reap what you sow.
 
ElishaElijah

ElishaElijah

Return
Sheldon said:
Look the word up yourself in any dictionary, I am done spoon feeding basic facts to you, since you don't even do me the courtesy of addressing what I post most of the time.
Click to expand...
I didn’t ask what the meaning of proselytizing is, @Subduction Zone said my post was proselytizing for one and you a song about truth for the other. You said it was so why was the song about speaking the truth proselytizing?
 
Sheldon

Sheldon

Veteran Member
questfortruth said:
They are preparing another ban for a Christian, do not mess it up. I want to suffer more.
Click to expand...

I would be minded to ask why so many Christians enjoy playing the martyr, but I guess it is too obvious an answer. No one can ban anyone from here, other than those who administer the site. Proselytising is against the rules, and if you want to avoid censure, then it's best to abide by those rules, as must we all.

I never chose to whine when I failed to properly do this, but then sackcloth and ashes doesn't really become an atheist. Will anyone be donning a thorn of crowns for the apotheosis of this shameless display I wonder.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top