Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No. An agnostic is a fence sitter entertaining theism and atheism.can an atheist be both atheist and agnostic?
especially if a theist can be both theist and gnostic?
isn't a person who has chosen to hold a lack of negative/positive belief in a god, a fence sitter? neither believing, disbelieving?No. An agnostic is a fence sitter entertaining theism and atheism.
No. An agnostic is a fence sitter entertaining theism and atheism.
If you are still entertaining possibilities, then that means there is something there that supports theistic views even if there is a diminished view that a god or supernatural phenomenon exists.isn't a person who has chosen to hold a lack of negative/positive belief in a god, a fence sitter? neither believing, disbelieving?
Yes. Otherwise it would be pointless to classify myself as a gnostic atheist.can an atheist be both atheist and agnostic?
especially if a theist can be both theist and gnostic?
No. An agnostic is a fence sitter entertaining theism and atheism.
not really. the person is choosing not to take a stance; so they are sitting on the fence.If you are still entertaining possibilities, then that means there is something there that supports theistic views even if there is a diminished view that a god or supernatural phenomenon exists.
An atheist sees no possibilities whatsoever, so the view is there is nothing whatsoever including possibilities that a God or supernatural phenomenon exists.
If you are still entertaining possibilities, then that means there is something there that supports theistic views even if there is a diminished view that a god or supernatural phenomenon exists.
An atheist sees no possibilities whatsoever, so the view is there is nothing whatsoever including possibilities that a God or supernatural phenomenon exists.
Not true. Most atheists do not say it is *impossible*, just that it isn't actually the case.If you are still entertaining possibilities, then that means there is something there that supports theistic views even if there is a diminished view that a god or supernatural phenomenon exists.
An atheist sees no possibilities whatsoever, so the view is there is nothing whatsoever including possibilities that a God or supernatural phenomenon exists.
Your the evil one trying to muscle my nefarious plans for a world without God's. Bwahaha!I like how you take one definition and exclude at least one other. How come you are Authoritarian and deny us the FREEDOM to use other definitions? Are you Evil?
Actually it's more that there is no reason whatsoever to even remotely entertain any notion of possibility. So it remains as being one without possibility in alignment with one without God's.Not true. Most atheists do not say it is *impossible*, just that it isn't actually the case.
Actually it's more that there is no reason whatsoever to even remotely entertain any notion of possibility. So it remains as being one without possibility in alignment with one without God's.
According to this chart, the only possible identifier for me would be “hot mess.”
I see no point in entertaining any notion of God's as much as there is no point in entertaining a non existant possibility.Again I like how you are a gnostic atheist. I am not.
I see no point in entertaining any notion of God's as much as there is no point in entertaining a non existant possibility.