MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
It is already called "important", important design (id)...
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
EVOLUTION is FALSIFIED!!!!
- Thread starter MrIntelligentDesign
- Start date
MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
It is so easy to summarize it, but since the topic is broad, you will never understand it.
If it's easy why not give it a try. It's your work, if you can't explain it so the average person can understand it who will?
MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
ToE is wrong and falsified because ToE had a wrong basis. The correct basis of change is intelligently guided change (intellen) as guided by Intelligent Selection, from Biological Interrelation BiTs.
That's repeating your claim not explaining it. What is the wrong basis of ToE?
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
You keep making that allegation, so maybe provide objectively derived evidence to support it.
As a theist myself, I well know that my belief is based on my beliefs from other sources, thus not based on basic science.
If you cannot explain it, and you won't summarize it, and the rest of us are so incapable of learning it, then why do you bother telling people about it? How do you expect people to help you spread the word if you won't give us the word? For that matter, why should we even listen to you? Doesn't seem to be any point.
You could call it anything. It could be a goat. Doesn't seem to matter. You can't explain it. Or won't explain it. No one else in the entire world knows what it is.
If no one can understand it but you, then how do you think your amazing, grand, stupendous, miraculous, powerful, incredible, wonderful, sexy, attractive, charming...idea is going to be communicated or implemented?
I thought the "i" was for intelligent. See. How do you think people are going to help you support your idea when no one knows what it is and even you keep changing it? It hardly seems like a good use of your time to even not talk about it to all of us.
MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
I had already explained in my article. I can copy and paste here if you want..
EVOLUTION IS FALSIFIED!
MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
I already written and shown that in my article. EVOLUTION IS FALSIFIED!
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You need to do more than just link to a poorly written paper by someone that has no clue what he is talking about. If you repeatedly do that it may be judged to be trolling. You need to be able to support your claims here.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
@MrIntelligentDesign let me help you out a bit. When you supply a work you must be ready to defend every aspect of it. It did not take too long going through your article to find what appears to be an errant claim:
"On<sic> 1859 AD, a group of scientists had concluded that the shape of the earth is Flat"
Really? Citation needed. And not just some book that they supposedly wrote that does not turn up in a Google search. What group of scientists? Where? Give us a link to this published work at the very least. I don't know of any scientists that did this.
If you cannot support this you have already failed.
"On<sic> 1859 AD, a group of scientists had concluded that the shape of the earth is Flat"
Really? Citation needed. And not just some book that they supposedly wrote that does not turn up in a Google search. What group of scientists? Where? Give us a link to this published work at the very least. I don't know of any scientists that did this.
If you cannot support this you have already failed.
That article is incomprehensible, so it is difficult to say what you have written there. Of course, it hardly seems relevant what a unsubstantiated claim is called.
Go ahead. Why not? It won't explain or summarize anything, but apparently you think it does. Dazzle us.
No I don't want you to copy and paste. I keep telling you I read the article and can't comprehend it but your answer is to keep linking it. I wasted a lot of my time yesterday and the day before reading it and watching your videos, as far as I can tell you make claims you falsified evolution but never reveal how. You saying something doesn't make it fact. A simplified short summary for layman like me of how you came to your conclusions is not a lot to ask.
MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and Introducing ToE's Replacement
In science, a wrong theory or explanation must be falsified and replaced. In here, I falsified Evolution because Evolution is wrong. Science must talk and explain reality, but Evolution is not discussing reality for the following reasons:
1, Wrong basis of reality. Non-intentional change is wrong since biological cell is intellen;
2. Limited Scope of reality in biology. Biological living organisms are dealing with reality in broader scope, then expected;
3. No exclusive explanation. There are no exclusive explanations when the change is non-intentional since those changes could also be seen in intentional change;
4. Natural Methodological inconsistency. If there are two or more competing scenarios, they must be settled first before concluding which is the best scenario as seen in reality. Evolution has nothing on this.
The method or tool used in falsification and replacement is from the new Intelligent Design <id> and all of discoveries. And the replacement is called Biological Interrelation Theory that is broader and wider in scope than Evolution. Thus, Evolution is not only falsified but replaced.
EVOLUTION IS FALSIFIED!
That is incomprehensible to the average person. What does "intellen" mean? A google search reveals nothing other than a pokemon reference and site for Native American art.
In your videos you compare yourself to Einstein and Newton, and claim to be the most intelligent human alive today. Surely the smartest man in the world should be able to explain his discoveries in such a way that us lesser humans can understand.
Ashoka
श्री कृष्णा शरणं मम
That's hilarious lol.
MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
I told you, it is an ANALOGY...