I don't like that. But in a way, it's no different from every other piece of introduced technology, in the sense that is to say, that they all seem to represent behavior modulation going forward. I've been trying to articulate this better for a while. It's the idea that at a certain point in history, man is compelled to understand infrastructure and technology more than it understands, or serves, him.
One sticking point in my mind regarding all of this, has to be the recent tragic event where a trucker out west was sentenced to I think 100 years, for failing to understand or react well to brake failure. Conversely, if the operators of the apollo 13 had crashed and caused accidental death, and the crew miraculously survived, then the fault would surely be placed on the nascent technologies they interfaced
Another example, is what social media and the internet have done to amplify social credit, paperwork, and illuminate away anonymity in social action. Case and point, my guess is that it was many times easier for you to secure an apartment when you were 20, when the internet barely existed, and when character-specific detail was either private or non-illuminated by the greater modern database effect
But back to your robot: people complain all the time that they want 'objective' standards for judgement, but the issue is that this dehumanizes you, and reveals that everyone is actually flawed. So if you confuse the robot too much with objectivity, then basically I don't see how you also don't conflate it with being your God. And that God has little use for associating subjective behavior with divinity
The way I see it, people will never behave as good as the bar set by artificial/technologically enabled standards dictates that they should, or, they will mess up possibly while trying to (like maybe what happened with the trucker). But for some reason or the other, this perhaps being the child of all the major religions and philosophies humans have chosen to associate with, is born a modern obsession with objectivity
Better to sublimate this intractable fact of human behavior somehow, then to meet it with a cold sorting computation. And how that is done, I have no idea. But again, people will protest from now until the sun swallows the earth. What is it they really want? What is keeping them from being satisfied - well, maybe it is natural that people sometimes be unsatisfied, and this is poorly understood.