Shortest proof of Jesus Christ

[questfortruth]

It is wrong to say, that we can not know all. Because there is no limit (for example, 80%) to research. If we get to know all 100%, we get to know, that we are all-knowing. Hence, the all-knowing being does exist.

My premise is: ``future research will tell us about twice as much as we know in 2021AD''.
From it I derive the theorem: ``somebody has achieved that in 2021AD.''
All you need is to accept the premise, you do not need to accept as a premise the
result of the proof.

Nobody loves my paper, not because of flaws. Simply, we had no sex or
other type of personal contact. To get loved by the communities,
you need good social wellness and ability. Otherwise, your work won't be
loved. The more of love, the fewer mistakes they see in your work.

I am not about the ultimate love expression (which is sex), but about
social skills. You do not trust my paper, because you had no physical
contact with me. We haven't been on conference somewhere. Hence, your
instinct and immunity tell you to ignore me as I would be a virus or a
monster.

 

[Spirit of Light]

Since there is no limit to research, the limit of knowledge cannot be 80%. Therefore, the smartest creature should know perfect 100%. Such a being also knows that he exists. Therefore, in 100% knowledge, there must be knowledge of the existence of an omniscient being.

How do this prove Jesus? What is your own proof?

 

[ratiocinator]

Since there is no limit to research, the limit of knowledge cannot be 80%. Therefore, the smartest creature should know perfect 100%. Such a being also knows that he exists. Therefore, in 100% knowledge, there must be knowledge of the existence of an omniscient being.

Nothing in this tells us that a so called "smartest creature", that knows 100%, actually exists, and what has this got to do with Jesus, anyway?

 

[SalixIncendium]

Since there is no limit to research, the limit of knowledge cannot be 80%. Therefore, the smartest creature should know perfect 100%. Such a being also knows that he exists. Therefore, in 100% knowledge, there must be knowledge of the existence of an omniscient being.

Your logic never fails to astound me.

 

[questfortruth]

Nothing in this tells us that a so called "smartest creature", that knows 100%, actually exists, and what has this got to do with Jesus, anyway?

there is no limit to research

 

[questfortruth]

Nothing in this tells us that a so called "smartest creature", that knows 100%, actually exists, and what has this got to do with Jesus, anyway?

It is wrong to say, that we can not know all. Because there is no limit to research. If we get to know all, we get to know, that we are gods. Hence, the God does exist.

 

[ratiocinator]

there is no limit to research

How do you know and so what if there is? It also contradicts the idea that some being could know everything because that would be the limit of research.

Regardless, you have got nowhere near to arguing that some being exists that knows everything. You'd have to (baselessly) assume that 'research' can tell us everything and that somebody (or some group) had actually achieved that.

Give up trying to do logic, you either don't have the aptitude, you haven't studied it enough, or you're too blinded by irrational faith.

 

[ratiocinator]

It is wrong to say, that we can not know all. Because there is no limit to research. If we get to know all, we get to know, that we are gods. Hence, the God does exist.

Not even valid, let alone sound.

 

[questfortruth]

You'd have to (baselessly) assume that 'research' can tell us everything and that somebody (or some group) had actually achieved that.

No. All my premise is:
"'research' can tell us everything"

From it I derive the theorem:
"somebody (or some group) had actually achieved that"

All you need is to accept the premise, you do not need to accept as premise the result of the proof.

 

[ratiocinator]

It is wrong to say, that we can not know all. Because there is no limit to research. If we get to know all, we get to know, that we are gods. Hence, the God does exist.

1. We don't know that there is no limit to research.
2. We don't know that research can tell us everything.
3. We have no reason at all to conclude that some being has already achieved full knowledge, even if it is possible.

 

[ratiocinator]

No. All my premise is:
"'research' can tell us everything"

From it I derive the theorem:
"somebody (or some group) had actually achieved that"

Simply a non-sequitur. Seriously, what planet are you on? A possibility of knowing everything (from research) says nothing at all about whether somebody has achieved it or not.

 

[questfortruth]

Simply a non-sequitur. Seriously, what planet are you on? A possibility of knowing everything (from research) says nothing at all about whether somebody has achieved it or not.

My premise is: ``future research will tell us about twice as much as we know in 2021AD''.

From it I derive the theorem: ``somebody has achieved that in 2021AD.''

All you need is to accept the premise, you do not need to accept as a premise the
result of the proof.

 

[Spirit of Light]

Simply a non-sequitur. Seriously, what planet are you on? A possibility of knowing everything (from research) says nothing at all about whether somebody has achieved it or not.

Ayahuasca

 

[ratiocinator]

All my premise is:
"'research can tell us twice as much as in 2021AD".

From it I derive the theorem:
"somebody has actually achieved that in 2021AD."

Repeating a mistake isn't going to change the fact that it's a mistake.

 

[questfortruth]

Repeating a mistake isn't going to change the fact that it's a mistake.

Nobody loves my paper, not because of flaws. Simply, we had no sex or
other type of personal contact. To get loved by the communities,
you need good social wellness and ability. Otherwise, your work won't be
loved. The more of love, the fewer mistakes they see in your work.

 

[Spirit of Light]

Nobody loves my proof, not because of flaws. Simply, we had no sex, or other type of body contact.
To get loved by scientific community, you need good sexual health and ability. Otherwise, your work won't be loved. The more love - the less mistakes they see in your work.

WUT

 

[questfortruth]

WUT

Corrected. Please reread.

 

[Spirit of Light]

Corrected. Please reread.

Corrected. Please reread.

How is it possible to put anything about sex in a discussion about proof of Jesus or God, What you write has nothing to do with science or logic

 

[questfortruth]

How is it possible to put anything about sex in a discussion about proof of Jesus or God, What you write has nothing to do with science or logic

It is not a forbidden word.

 

[Spirit of Light]

It is not a forbidden word.

What does that have to do with the comment I made about you speaking about sex in a discussion about Jesus?