Ah, yes, Mickey Mouse's dog.Never. Neither possible nor practical. Remember Pluto and his Utopia.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Ah, yes, Mickey Mouse's dog.Never. Neither possible nor practical. Remember Pluto and his Utopia.
It was only His job to each His disciples who would carry His message far and wide and teach others.That's his job - to be recognized and to teach people.
How many people believe something means absolutely NOTHING. You are committing the fallacy of argumentum ad populum.No it is not, but Bahaullah has definitely convinced far fewer than Mirzā Ghulām Ahmad. But even Mirza Ghulam has not reached even 1% of the world.
Why would humanity accept Bahaollah as a messenger of God when he cannot provide any proof of his mission?it is humanity's job to recognize who He was.
Baha'u'llah was given a mission by God, ..
“He who shall accept and believe, shall receive his reward; and he who shall turn away, shall receive none other than his own punishment.”
He did provide proof.Why would humanity accept Bahaollah as a messenger of God when he cannot provide any proof of his mission?
You are living in ancient times when a teacher could talk to only to a small group of people around him.It was only His job to each His disciples who would carry His message far and wide and teach others.
It is true that it is humanity's job to recognize him, but it looks like not that many have accepted Bahaullah yet and it has already been over a 100 years. But it is OK if you still live in hope.It was not HIS Job to convince people of who He was, it is humanity's job to recognize who He was.
That's right, He attended no schools. He got His knowledge from God, who is All-Knowing.His own self: Uneducated. Attended no school. No knowledge of science.
You are living in ancient times when a teacher could talk to only to a small group of people around him.
I do not have to have hope that people will recognize Baha’u’llah because how many people recognize Baha’u’llah has absolutely no bearing on who He was. Even if only one person recognized Him, He would still be the return of Christ and the Messiah because it was God who sent Him.It is true that it is humanity's job to recognize him, but it looks like not that many have accepted Bahaullah yet and it has already been over a 100 years. But it is OK if you still live in hope.
Those were ancient times. Today he would have twitter/facebook followers and in a TV appearance, he could talk to millions at once. He would not need intermediaries.Baha’u’llah did not live in ancient times, He lived in contemporary times, but still He could only talk to a few around Him
Good luck! Great to be a Messiah not know by anyone (or just few)! He might as well have not come. Jesus and Muhammad on the other hand have influenced over a billion people each.Even if only one person recognized Him, He would still be the return of Christ and the Messiah because it was God who sent Him.
But what about what Isaiah said, and how can people live on this earth without some kind of government?
Isaiah 9:6-7 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this.
What evidence do you have that "world leaders want it"?
Do you see Biden, Xi, Putin, Modi and Merkel agreeing on much? I don't.
Most politicians are against nationalism? Trump? Xi? Putin? Bolsonaro? Erdogan? Orban? Johnson? Modi? All these are notorious for being nationalists.By what I know, most of politicians are against nationalism, which makes them all supporters of the one world government. But, unfortunately, I have not enough time to seek all evidence for that. It would be interesting to see how many relevant politicians you would find that are against the idea of one world government.
I don’t see Biden saying anything own nowadays. It seems like his puppet masters are afraid he would mistakenly speak the truth. However, by what I know Biden has authored a paper ‘On The Threshold Of The New World Order’, which indicates he wants one world government.
Putin seems to be against it, at least because all most the rest of the world seems to against him and Russia. It would explain well why western world seems to desire war with Russia.
And that is what Jesus did, He set us free, according to my beliefs.Jesus is different kind of king, because he came to set people free.
It is not a matter of what he would need, it is a matter of what he would use. He could use the media if he wanted to but that is not how Messengers of God operate. They do not want to be obvious because in that case the wheat could not be separated from the chaff.Those were ancient times. Today he would have twitter/facebook followers and in a TV appearance, he could talk to millions at once. He would not need intermediaries.
Do you know anything about the history of religion and how long it takes for a religion to spread?Good luck! Great to be a Messiah not know by anyone (or just few)! He might as well have not come. Jesus and Muhammad on the other hand have influenced over a billion people each.
Are we coming upon a situation where the world will go along with one organization and agree to certain rules and standards for all? Will, we actually have a one-world government or is this a conspiracy theory? Why do Christians believe it's the coming of the anti-Christ?
What do Christians have against it and what would it mean for Americans? Would it be beneficial to us? What exactly does a one-world government have that we need?
They operate in whatever way they think is best to spread their message. They don't care how someone else has done it before or how some person thinks they should.that is not how Messengers of God operate
You are still stuck in the past. This is a globalized, interconnected, instant communication world. Old history where Jesus could just talk with people within a radius of a few miles does not apply any more.Do you know anything about the history of religion and how long it takes for a religion to spread?
How would you know that a Messenger of God would operate that way? Has any Messenger of God in the past tried to spread His message? No. That is how we know that is not their goal.Trailblazer said: that is not how Messengers of God operate
They operate in whatever way they think is best to spread their message. They don't care how someone else has done it before or how some person thinks they should.
You still are not getting it. How fast a religion grows and thus how large a religion becomes has nothing to do with the Messenger of God who revealed that religion, since the Messenger is not the one who carries his message to humanity. All he does is garner a few disciples and those disciples carry the message in the first generation, and then those they teach continue teaching the message from generation to generation, and thereby the religion grows larger.Trailblazer said: Do you know anything about the history of religion and how long it takes for a religion to spread?
You are still stuck in the past. This is a globalized, interconnected, instant communication world. Old history where Jesus could just talk with people within a radius of a few miles does not apply any more.
What are talking about? Jesus told many parables, gave a sermon, recited beatitudes - that was his message. Muhammad wrote a whole book. Bahaullah of course is not in that class.Has any Messenger of God in the past tried to spread His message?
This was true in the old days when a single person could not broadcast his message to the world. Nowadays there is not need of intermediaries. A new 'Messenger' can broadcast his message in realtime to the whole world without any middlemen. You are living in the past and telling yourself thousand year old stories.the Messenger is not the one who carries his message to humanity
But they were not trying to spread their messages, except to those who they came in contact with, primarily their disciples.Trailblazer said: Has any Messenger of God in the past tried to spread His message?
What are talking about? Jesus told many parables, gave a sermon, recited beatitudes - that was his message. Muhammad wrote a whole book. Bahaullah of course is not in that class.
Trailblazer said: the Messenger is not the one who carries his message to humanity.
This was true in the old days when a single person could not broadcast his message to the world. Nowadays there is no need of intermediaries. A new 'Messenger' can broadcast his message in realtime to the whole world without any middlemen. You are living in the past and telling yourself thousand year old stories.
Unless you are a Prophet who can predict the future you have no way of knowing what is going to happen with the Baha’i Faith, but like I said before, it does not matter how large the Baha’i Faith is because the truth is the truth and numbers are no indication of what is the truth.In any case, the Bahai faith will never reach the number of people that Christianity or Islam has done whatever the annual rate of increase in recent years may be. You can of course dream about it.
Jesus addressed every person who gathered around him. Muhammad went to war to spread his message across the region. In today's world, Muhammad would have probably started a global war to spread his message. Like I said Bahaullah is not in their class.But they were not trying to spread their messages, except to those who they came in contact with, primarily their disciples.
Yes, like 'Wisdom of the Crowds'! It is arrogance to believe that a small group of people know better than everyone else.This type of argument is known by several names