No. I'm content with what I have shared and the links I provided cite the sources of the quotes.
That amount of effort would exceed the amount of interest I have in this subject.
Besides - based on your reaction - I don't think you would accept anything I'd share anyways.
Cheers.
Your sources dont support your claim. So if you are content, that's your prerogative, just that it is absolutely third party and you have not provided any reason to why you trust it.
So it seems like your whole point was not true, that there is no indication that Muhammed told others not to write something in any of the primary sources, and all you had was some links who speak of post hoc ergo propter hoc information which you cannot substantiate by yourself.
Hope you understand.
Anyway, just to make an explanation, you would have realise that you did not pose any primary sources. The only primary source you will be able to quote about a verse that was sent down and not included in the Quran is the verse about a goat eating that verse that was written down and kept by where he sleeps. This apparently happened during his funeral.
1. Goats dont eat their own skin. Those days, they didnt have paper in the early 7th century. They used velum. So think a bit, not blindly repeat what others say.
2. This story is not Sarih because the mathn is invalid.
3. Historically this is a story narrated by Farabri about 3 centuries after Muhammed and written down even after that. Thus, how do you validate it? Whats your methodology? Is it blind faith or is there a methodology at all?
4. This hadith is a story that "supposedly" happened after Muhammed died. Thus, it is false to say "Muhammed got revelation, and then he told his scribes to not write it". That is a made up sentence you made. Thats why you can never provide a source that says that. Because it is made up. Maybe someone else made that up.
Use your intellect. Dont repeat what people say.
Cheers.