Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber
Trump is going to the courts without evidence to undermine the election. And he keeps going on about how he won but illegal votes abd conspiracy nonsense stole it from him.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
PA Judge throws out Trump case
- Thread starter ecco
- Start date
Do you think justices Trump appointed always rule as he'd want?That's rather how it seemed to me, but I'm British so guessing a bit here.
What I find funny is the notion that the Supreme Court will do what suits Trump because he's appointed so many of the judges. That's how a jumped-up real state dealer thinks, no doubt. But they are, in fact, judges. They will not have any intention of presiding over the collapse of the USA into a banana republic. If he does get to the Supreme Court, which I doubt, it will be popcorn time.
exchemist
Veteran Member
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber
Trump has no evidence. Its why his cases arent working.
exchemist
Veteran Member
No. That is my point.
They would go to the he Supreme Court to rule that this PA court must hear the evidence, not to take the evidence to the Supreme Court. The PA Court is fighting to not hear the evidence. It doesn’t mean there isn’t evidence.
Obviously, the conspiracy is so sophisticated that the
Democrats effected it without leaving a trace of evidence.
He should make that argument in court.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber
What evidence? Trump has supplied none. I know Trump has been telling you for years he has all this stuff and all these plans and ideas and things happening, but its been nothing more than talk. Just as it is now. His base of Trumpeters may accept words alone as evidence but the courts do not.
Aye, they've already shown independence.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber
And they did ot all without giving themselves a Congressional edge. Those bozos at least let us know they are incredibly skilled yet equally incredible bad at cheating.
Team Trump has evidence. It will be presented in a court following the rules of evidence. The cases are actually working. It takes time. But the evidence will become public record. That is what Trump’s opponents are fighting and trying to stall.
It won’t work. Once again Trump’s opponents underestimate him. Trump has several goals. One is to win re-election. That’s true. His opponents are focusing on that. But Trump has other goals too. One of which is to “drain the swamp”. Which includes documenting systemic voting irregularities. In other words, all these court cases work to Trump’s long term goal. After all is said and done the meme of “Where’s the evidence?” will be rend asunder.
If SCOTUS overturns the will of the people and anoints Trump there will be a revolution to overthrow the tyrant.
Any "evidence" they have is bought and paid for by liars.
Calm down there, fella.
Tis all as likely as the justices performing in an all nude dance contest.
(Let the mental image of that dissuade you from such fears.)
#zombiesarepeopletoo
You statement that he going to court “without” evidence is factually incorrect. He is going with evidence which will be disclosed in court using the rules of evidence. That is how the system works. The evidence is disclosed in court, not before.
If so, then a court of law will decide that. Not the court of public opinion, a biased media or internet denizens. In other words, that is just your opinion.
This raises the question why they've not presented
any even when appropriate under our system....
Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit - CNNPolitics
Trump campaign lawsuit in Michigan thrown out of court