gnostic
The Lost One
It doesn't matter how many times you repeat your crank ideas. They are not even part of the debate and have never been.
If you believe light travels differently in deep space you need to provide evidence. If you believe spacetime is any different than our local spacetime then you need to provide evidence. That's just to begin a debate. Then we can assess the probablity and the evidence.
Then you would also need to explain why when we look into the universe it looks like light and spacetime are exactly like they are here. Why the physics we see in deep space looks exactly like the physics we have in our solar system. Why everything in deep space behaves exactly how our local laws of physics predicts it should. Galaxy clusters, black holes, star formation, everything works the same.
You would have to explain why these "different laws of physics" send photons to us from deep space and the images we see strangely make everything look as if the laws of physics are exactly the same as our laws. Even things we cannot see like gravity waves. Our laws of physics made a prediction down to trillionths of a degree and using those laws we were able to detect a gravity wave. Which again shows the gravity wave is following the exact same laws we are.
I told you in one of the first posts you are not here to debate honestly, just waste time. No evidence, just over and over and over with "fishbowl" or "different laws".
Cosmological theories are not religion because they use the available evidence and because they continue to change as new information is found. In the 1940s the debate was steady state universe vs big band model. The version that provided evidence won. If new evidence comes in then the model can be updated.
When new information comes in about your ancient myths you use denial and hide your head in the sand and call scholars heretics. So your not even honest about calling science religion.
Go ahead, prove cosmology doesn't use evidence. Demonstrate that light changes when it enters the solar system. Explain why it magically gives the illusion that everything in deep space is using the same laws but it's actually an illusion. Why our local group of galaxies look to be around the same age even though you say they are not and time is different in deep space?
Why proto-galaxies that we see that are around 12 billion years old look like a 1 billion year old galaxy should. Why this "illusion" light comes to us and makes everything look so perfect and fits our version of how the universe developed? But it's really an illusion?
Why neutron stars spin at the exact correct rate the theory predicts? Why light from a supernova hits us from 40 light years away and then we look and see a 40 year old supernova?
You haven't offered one single explanation to suggest this evidence is not good evidence that the laws of physics is the same everywhere as is spacetime.
You haven't given evidence as to why would time run different. General relativity deals with time dilation and gravity. The objects in space are all following the rules of GR exactly as is predicted. Across the entire universe. So time would be as well.
Or does it just look that way because of the Yahweh illusion? Provide evidence for this illusion. And why would Yahweh create an illusion that the universal laws are all working the same? Why not just make the universe the same? No evidence. No sense. Nothing? Even Yahweh is like "Dude, what are you talking about??"
You just continue with the same response....... "oh light from the Hubble....different laws......blah blah.....It is the biggest debate fail I have ever seen.
Dad has ability to twist everything, by calling his religious belief “scientific” and “logical”, while science are “religious belief” and “faith”...up becomes down, left becomes right.
The hubris to think that everything scientists are wrong, and that he is never wrong about anything. It is quite amazing since he has never studied science and don’t understand maths and logic.