You really got this backward. If you have one OR MANY MORE EVIDENCE than you have falsifiable evidence, regardless whether the evidence are FOR or AGAINST the model.
The first 2 scenarios indicate that a model is FALSIFIABLE and TESTABLE....and
TESTED!!!
A FALSIFIABLE model doesn’t mean is true or false model, it just mean the model is “testable” and “refutable”.
But if you already have EVIDENCE FOR model or EVIDENCE AGAINST the model, then by definition the model that is both FALSIFIABLE and TESTED.
That’s what falsifiable mean in science - any or many evidence - the proposed models are falsifiable.
This is wrong too. And this last part is a horrible example.
You don’t need to find “every single particle in the universe”. Where you get this absurd ideas from?
Look, leroy. If you remember the white swans example that shunyadragon provided.
If you see a number of swans that are white in a park, then claimed all swans are white. But then find some more white swans plus some black swans in another park on the other side of town.
Then the statement is definitely wrong because black swans do exist too, but you would only need one swan, regardless of the color, to confirm that claim is falsifiable and yet the rationality to be wrong.
AND I don’t need to count every single swans on Earth to determine whether the claim is falsifiable or not. That wouldn’t be practical to find every single swan on Earth.
The problem isn’t about the falsifiability of the claim, but the making of SWEEPING RATIONALITY that “all swans are white” that’s wrong.
It is only when you claim that there are “no swans exist”, when there are swans that you can actually see, then the rationality of the claim is not only wrong, it is also unfalsifiable.
Wow!
You really are incapable of learning and incapable of learning from your mistakes.
Since to date, no aliens have been actually observed, then making any positive statement about aliens’ colors (eg green, blue) is unfalsifiable, and the rationality is speculative at best.
Until you can confirm that aliens exist, any statement made are considered purely speculative and unfalsifiable.
It is the same with Designer and gods. All of them ID, YEC and OEC are all unfalsifiable concepts, until you can observe, measure and test gods or Designer.
You really are confusing what is falsifiable and what unfalsifiable. You are incapable of learning what falsifiability, and you are refusing to admit that you have made some mistakes. You just making of the same errors, over and over again, accumulating and compounding your errors. It is just painfully staggering to watch this happen.
I really don’t know how to help you, when you are letting your ego and ignorance prevent you from understanding where you have made serious errors with your claims.
I really don’t know what else to do.