• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

As Arranged, Trump Has Been Acquitted

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
secular humanism has turned the world into a moral cesspool. And that's a fact.

I'm sure that you see a moral cesspool, but that is because you have had too much to drink from the Christian cup. They teach you to think like that if you'll let them. It's typical of cultic thinking to try to separate you from those outside the cult. You have been taught that the rest of the world is a failure because it didn't have enough Christianity.

The opposite is true. The world is a wonderful place, and life has been good living in it. Your religion cheated you of that knowledge. You shouldn't have trusted it. You would have been happier as a secular humanist.

My world is good and beautiful. You're angry. I'm grateful. You're waiting to be whisked away from here to something that they needed to convince you was better to keep receiving your tithes. I rejected that message, am savoring life, and still have my would-be tithes to facilitate that..

If you think Islam and Christianity are pretty much the same, then your ignorance of both takes center stage.

That's not a rebuttal. I gave you multiple areas in which they overlapped, You failed to address any of that. The argument stands unchanged because there is no need to modify an argument that was merely waved away rather than rebutted.

You also failed to address the argument that the main difference in the rendering of Islam and Christianity relates to where in the world they are typically found, and that only one of those areas has had the benefit of the civilizing and humanizing effects of secular humanistic philosophy for many centuries now. That argument therefore also stands unrebutted and therefore unchanged.

Conflating the Jewish theocracy that has passed, with the true Christian position on a free society is disingenuous.

My purpose was to show that Christian values are not the same as the values embedded in the US Constitution. You also failed to rebut that.
 

Spartan

Well-Known Member
I'm sure that you see a moral cesspool, but that is because you have had too much to drink from the Christian cup. They teach you to think like that if you'll let them. It's typical of cultic thinking to try to separate you from those outside the cult. You have been taught that the rest of the world is a failure because it didn't have enough Christianity.

The opposite is true. The world is a wonderful place, and life has been good living in it. Your religion cheated you of that knowledge. You shouldn't have trusted it. You would have been happier as a secular humanist.

My world is good and beautiful. You're angry. I'm grateful. You're waiting to be whisked away from here to something that they needed to convince you was better to keep receiving your tithes. I rejected that message, am savoring life, and still have my would-be tithes to facilitate that..

Yeah, we saw your wonderful world during the second world war without Christianity. Take a look at all the Christian crosses at the graveyard at Normandy Beach to see who stopped that evil. Then mosey over to Planned Parenthood and review their records on the millions of innocent babies they butchered. Which brings me to a question for you: How large a pile of bloody, aborted babies piled high on your front yard would it take before your sensibilities are offended? 100? 500? 10,000? Answer the question?

We also know what your 'wonderful world' will look like at the end times in the Book of Revelation and other scriptures. Only God stepping in will save the world.

"If the Lord had not cut short those days, no one would survive." - Mark 13:20

So go tell your pie-in-the-sky nonsense to somebody else. You have no idea what you're talking about.
 
Last edited:

Spartan

Well-Known Member
So, you deny slavery is supported in the Bible?

This is another subject you are a full quart low on knowledge about, because you haven't done your homework.

Slavery in the Bible was usually one of three things:

1. Voluntary servitude as a way of existence.

2. Punishment by God on sinful men and nations for their crimes against God and humanity.

3. A sin - enslaving one's fellow man - that wasn't approved by God.

And from my studies, that's it.

As an example of #2 there is Leviticus 25. The context of Leviticus 25 is entering into the Promised Land (25:2) which has been inhabited by the evil nations of the Hittites, Girga****es, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites—seven nations - all whom God ordered to be judged in Deuteronomy chapter 7. So any slaves taken there are a judgment by God on evil nations.
 

Good-Ole-Rebel

Well-Known Member
Link doesn't seem to work...

But be specific. Which modern laws today are based on values that are specifically Christian and not common to typical human society.

Google "The Adoption of the Common Law by the American Colonies" by R.C. Dale.

And, from (The Creation of the American Republic" by Gordon Wood, Norton, 1993) "The general principles of politics that the colonists sought to discover and apply were not merely abstractions that had to be created anew out of nature and reason. They were in fact already embodied in the historic English constitution...." (p. 10)

From (The Creation of the American Republic) "...the English, it seemed, had concretely achieved what political philosophers from antiquity on had only dreamed of. In the minds of the English colonists, indeed of the enlightened everywhere in the eighteenth century, the English constitution--'this beautiful system,' as Montewquieu called it--seemed to possess no national or cultural limitations. It had 'its foundatin in nature,' said Samuel Adams; its principles were from God and were universal, capable of application by all peoples who had the ability to sustain them." (p. 11)

As I said, our laws are built on English laws which were built on the Bible and Christianity. England, as Europe, was Christian.

Good-Ole-Rebel
 

Good-Ole-Rebel

Well-Known Member
You're trying to imply that a good life in a modern liberal democratic state is due to Christianity because Christianity is present in those countries, but life didn't get good in them until Christianity was subdued by Enlightenment values and secular humanism. What those desirable countries, which includes many nations of Western Europe, have in common, is several centuries of the moderating influence of humanist values, something the Islamic nations, especially in the Middle East, haven't had, and the main reason that they're still cutting off hands, dropping people from high towers, throwing acid in one another's face, and burning one another alive in cages. There is no reason that the Christians.

Islam and Christianity are pretty much the same religion on paper. Each reveres a Semitic desert god who is an angry, petty, vengeful, jealous, judgmental, capricious, prudish, strongman requiring worship and submission under threat of cosmic reprisal.

Believers of each attend temples (Mosques or churches) and obey paternalistic, misogynisitic clergy.

Both religions embrace magical thinking, mythology, dogma, the supernatural, and ritual.

Each feature demons angels, prayer, an afterlife, a judgment, and a system of reward and punishment after death.

They each think they have the right to determine who should be allowed to diddle whom how, who should be able to marry whom, and what women must do regarding their bodies.

Both are patriarchal, authoritarian, misogynistic, sexually repressive, anhedonisitic, atheophobic, homophobic, antiscientiific, use psychological terrorism on their children, have violent histories featuring torture, genocide and terrorism, and demand obedience and submission.

Each consider faith a virtue and reason a problem.

Each advocates theocracy over democracy.

I could go on, but you get the point. So why are Islam and Christianity rendered so differently in the countries where they dominate? Secular humanism in the West is the difference. Before that, Christians were as barbaric and brutal as the Muslims, putting people in large metal kettles and boiling them alive, or extracting admissions of impiety using the rack, the pear, and whatever other brutal torture they could conceive. Humanism eliminated that

If you switched the ideologies out, and put Christianity in Saudi Arabia and Islam in America, you would have Christian Arabs cutting off hands and heads, and American Muslims going door to door asking if you know Mohammed. America would still be a secular state with a Muslim majority forced to tolerate "infidels" thanks to humanist values, and Saudi would still be a brutal, intolerant theocracy, but a Christian one instead. There is no reason to believe otherwise.

And when the Muslims finally ban these practices, it will be because they have traded their Abrahamic practices for humanist values.



No, the origin of the US was a rejection of Christian values regarding statecraft.

If you want to see the Christian model for government, daily life, and the role of individuals, look to the Middle Ages, when Christian theocratic government was common. If you want to see the reaction to that and its rejection, look to the Enlightenment versions of those things, which you are crediting to Christianity..

I just had a lengthy exchange with another RF poster who was insisting that secular humanism was an outgrowth of Christianity. I disagreed, and refuted his claim by showing how secular humanism was a rejection of Christian values. The two have almost nothing in common beyond it being wrong to kill or steal.

Likewise here. The principles that define Americanism look nothing like those that define Christianity. When two modes of thought are related, they look alike, as Christianity and Islam do.

Christianity says there is one God, and its Bible commands us to worship it only and obey the Sabbath. Americanism says worship any god or no god.

Christianity teaches,
  • "Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves."- Romans 13:1-2
  • "Remind them to be submissive to rulers and authorities, to be obedient" - Titus 3:1
  • "For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, he hath also rejected thee from being king" - 1Samuel 15:23
Americanism is grounded in revolution against just such a governing authority, and includes democracy, free citizens with guaranteed rights, and sees them as autonomous citizens rather than them being viewed as subjects of a god and king.

Christianity is all about sin, redemption, and obedience. Americanism is about freedom and the pursuit of happiness. You didn't find those things in the Christian era, The Age of Faith. The Age of Reason, which followed, is a rejection of that model, just as reason itself is a rejection of faith, and faith a rejection of reason.

I am implying that the best countries to live today are those that have had the impact of Christianity upon them.

Islam and Christianity are in no way the same.

No, the U.S. is built on Christianity. Read the 'Mayflower Compact'. That is it's origin. And even though the U.S. gets farther away from it, you still have it. With the President, the Supreme Court justices, with right hand in the air and left hand on the Bible, they swear an oath. They arn't swearing an oath based on 'humanism'. It is to the God of the Bible.

Good-Ole-Rebel
 

Good-Ole-Rebel

Well-Known Member
Did we choose to be born here? And, as I have pointed out, people like me work against Christianity. Those of us moving America away from Jehovah. If say we've been so successful that Christians have had to pervert their faith by putting it on money, and have been so rocked by society moving away that they had to add it to things here and their so they don't forget.

Yes, I know, you work against Jesus Christ. My point was not what choice you had where you were born. It was that you do live in a country impacted by Christianity, and enjoy the benefits of it, yet you, as you say, 'work against Christiainity'.

I don't understand your last sentence. It started with 'If', yet didn't seem to complete the thought.

Good-Ole-Rebel
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
This is another subject you are a full quart low on knowledge about, because you haven't done your homework.

Slavery in the Bible was usually one of three things:

1. Voluntary servitude as a way of existence.

2. Punishment by God on sinful men and nations for their crimes against God and humanity.

3. A sin - enslaving one's fellow man - that wasn't approved by God.

And from my studies, that's it.

As an example of #2 there is Leviticus 25. The context of Leviticus 25 is entering into the Promised Land (25:2) which has been inhabited by the evil nations of the Hittites, Girga****es, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites—seven nations - all whom God ordered to be judged in Deuteronomy chapter 7. So any slaves taken there are a judgment by God on evil nations.
You just denied that God approves of slavery.
And then justified slavery in some circumstances.
I gots no Bible learn'n, but I observe that Christians
here owned slaves. So not all of them agree with you.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
I understand the basis for your belief.
But it's not compelling to non-believers.
Im not trying to be compelling. I'm saying I remember the report for basically say Trump is not guilty or exonerated, stuff happened with this person and that, I don't remember (and I don't care enough) but you can read all about it in Mueller's report.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
It was that you do live in a country impacted by Christianity,
That's most of the world in regards to Western culture in general. And, what matters is now. Because much of the world has also been influenced by the Ancient Greeks and Romans, Egypt, Mongolians, Africa, and pretty much every culture that hasn't been isolated has influenced and effected to others.
But, we can look at when society has been more Christian. It wasn't as good as what we have today.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
He's not done yet, SW. Do your end-times homework.
That's basically what I said, meaning the Prophets and Law have not been done away with.
Jefferson was no theist
Diest. As was Franklin and many others. And that doesn't matter. They are both Founding Fathers.
Thomas Pain was a spiritual midget. Pretty sure you never researched his sorry rear end in depth either. Here's what you missed:
Yup. He spent time in jail for violating blasphemy laws. A true hero, really.
Do your homework for a change.
I have. That's how I know that Thomas Paine, an Anti-Christ, was a founding father. It is official document that the US was not founded on Christian values. It doesn't matterwgat you think of them personally, those are the facts.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
This is another subject you are a full quart low on knowledge about, because you haven't done your homework.

Slavery in the Bible was usually one of three things:

1. Voluntary servitude as a way of existence.

2. Punishment by God on sinful men and nations for their crimes against God and humanity.

3. A sin - enslaving one's fellow man - that wasn't approved by God.
That doesn't matter. To own a human being as property, and the Bible makes it clear slaves are property, then that is inherently evil and if anything deserves to be called sinful it is that. And those who support or defend it, in any way, are morally bankrupt. And making it a punishment is cruel, wicked, malicious, and diabolical.
 

Spartan

Well-Known Member
That doesn't matter. To own a human being as property, and the Bible makes it clear slaves are property, then that is inherently evil and if anything deserves to be called sinful it is that. And those who support or defend it, in any way, are morally bankrupt. And making it a punishment is cruel, wicked, malicious, and diabolical.

You liberals should talk with your Plantation politics that enslaves blacks and others in your ghettos.
 

Spartan

Well-Known Member

(Jefferson a) Diest. As was Franklin and many others.

You still don't have a clue.

The two principle beliefs of Deism were:

1. Although God created the universe, he did not intervene in the affairs of men and nations. He did not guide men into the founding of nations, or do miracles, or answer prayer, or provide providential protection to his followers.

2. God did not give divine / revealed revelation to man (i.e. the Bible, prophecy, etc.)

For some reason the underline function won't turn off on this post so ignore it.

Now, both Jefferson and Franklin have quotations on file that show God does intervene in the affairs of men and nation, and Franlkin speaks of the "sacred scriptures"

Franklin: "I have lived, Sir, a long time and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth — that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid? We have been assured, Sir, in the sacred writings that “except the Lord build they labor in vain that build it.” I firmly believe this; and I also believe that without his concurring aid we shall succeed in this political building no better than the Builders of Babel"


Thomas Jefferson was hardly speaking from a strict deist standpoint when he said:

“Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; and that His justice cannot sleep forever.” (Notes on the State of Virginia, 1781)

Now, why should Jefferson tremble for his country if God does not involve himself in the affairs of men and nations?

Thus, your contention that Jefferson and Franklin later in life were deists is FALSE.

In addition, Dr. M. E. Bradford of the University of Dallas conducted a study of the Founding Founders to look at this question (whether the Founding Fathers were deists or Christians). He discovered the Founders were members of denominations as follows: twenty-eight Episcopalians, eight Presbyterians, seven Congregationalists, two Lutherans, two Dutch Reformed, two Methodists, two Roman Catholics, and three deists. – Reference: M. E. Bradford, A Worthy Company: Brief Lives of the Framers of the United States Constitution (Marlborough, NH: Plymouth Rock Foundation, 1982), iv–v.

You're busted.
 
Top