Native said:
↑
No it doesn´t. It just confirms the (contradicted) Standard Model perception of gravitational theory which couldn´t explain the galactic formation and motion at all, hence the "need" of inserting the a "dark matter" in first hand. You need to include other fundamental EM forces and get a much broader cosmic view in order to explain what happens in galaxies.
And:
This is because of the laws of Electromagnetism where the standing electric current in the galaxy causes a perpendicular magnetic field which again creates the galactic disk of which the Solar System is a part. The very similar EM proces happens when the Sun was formed and gave birth to the planets.
And I say this is wrong and not in agreement even with *your* sources.
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1302/1302.5663.pdf
Yes, there are electric and magnetic fields in galaxies. of that, there is no question. The issue is how strong they are and how they affect the dynamics. The actual values of the strength of the magnetic fields shows they don't significantly affect the dynamics.
Swirling Magnetic Fields Hint at Origins of Spiral Galaxy Shapes
Yes, we can use the magnetic fields to trace out what is going on dynamically in many cases. But that is the magnetic fields *responding* to the dynamics, not causing the dynamics. The fields tend to follow the dust particles.
Here is a quote from this source:
“The magnetic field looks like it’s along for the ride,” Jones says. “In other words, the magnetic field itself is not telling us where the spiral arms should be; the spiral arms are telling us where the magnetic field points.”
Magnetic-Field Discovery Gives Clues to Galaxy Formation Processes - National Radio Astronomy Observatory
Once again, the magnetic fields are things we can detect and map out, and they provide information because they 'go along for the ride'. That means they give us clues to what is going on. That does NOT mean they significantly affect what is going on. In fact, the size of these fields shows that they do not.
4.6 billion-year-old galaxy shines light on our universe
Yes, the dynamics of magnetic fields needs to be studied more. There are aspects, especially in early galaxy formation, that we do not understand. But, again, the strength of those fields is not enough to significantly affect the dynamics. They can *show* the dynamics, but it is gravity that is the main influencer of those dynamics.
Me:
"I agree that our Sun was formed out of a cosmic cloud of gas and dust, but this took place in the swirling galactic center which gave the initial rotational motion to the Sun and later on to the planets which were formed directly out of the rotating Sun, thus causing the orbital planes of the planets".
I agree that a
secondary formation proces can form stars out in the galactic arms, but it all starts in the galactic center.
Otherwise it doesn´t seem that your are updated with the latest news in modern cosmology and astrophysics . .
Galactic formation inside out:
Galaxies Grow from Inside Out - quote:
“New evidence from NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) and Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) missions provide support for the "inside-out" theory of galaxy evolution, which holds that star formation starts at the core of the galaxy and spreads outward”.
Just as I´ve sensed intuitively and said for some decades now . . . the initial formation of stars in galaxies starts at the core and spreads outwards. This is why the standard cosmologists were baffled regarding the gravitational assumptions and the discovered "galactic rotation anomaly", compared to the planetary motions in the Solar System. The entire gravitational idea doesn´t compute universally.
Nope, the two have NOTHING to do with each other. The magnetic and electric fields (which do exist) are simply not strong enough to explain this anomaly.
This motion of an inside-out formation in galaxies also discards the assumed ide of a "heavy central black object/hole" in the galactic center and this outgoing motion of star formation is STILL mirrored in the motions of the Solar System with the increased distances between the Earth and the Sun and between the Earth and the Moon.
Where did you get the idea that galaxies forming inside out negates the existence of central black holes? We *know* there are central black holes in most galaxies.
There is NO "gravitational spinning frame-dragging" between the Earth and the Moon which makes the Moon to move away from the Earth as gravitationally ASSUMED in the Standard Cosmology. This is just a logical result of the fact that the Moon once was formed OUT from the Earth - another "inside-out" formation which once was started in the inside-out formation in the galaxy.
Wrong in so many ways. First, the motion of the moon away from the Earth (which has been measured) is NOT due to 'frame-dragging', which is a general relativistic effect, but simply by tidal forces. This is well-understood and not controversial.
Second, we KNOW that the Moon formed from the Earth and has moved away and not the reverse.
Third, again, this motion has NOTHING to do with the spiral structure or motion of our galaxy in the large.