• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Human footprint on 500 million year old trilobite fossil

Bear Wild

Well-Known Member
The solution is quite obvious. Some human in the future will finally create a working time machine, and will go back in time to see what it was like. While there, he will accidentally leave the footprint, mystifying all those of us who still believe that time travel is impossible.
Close but this is absolute proof that Dr. Who really exists.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I don't trust scientists to be truthful or sincere in their research over all.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I don't trust theists to be truthful or sincere in their messages over all.
I think we are even.

Yup, actually, I don't trust Theists either, I look for God's rope and try to get through the corruption they have surrounded God's rope with and the falsehood they without knowledge and evidence attribute to him.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Mods, if this OP are in the wrong category feel free to move it.

500 Million-Year-Old Human Footprint Fossil Baffles Scientists

How do creationists and evolutionists see this in their own beliefs?
How come that science has not spoken about finding like this the same way they speak of other forms of science?
Are science afraid of saying they are wrong? or does it go deeper than that?
I looked at the pictures, but I didn't see a human footprint anywhere.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
I looked at the pictures, but I didn't see a human footprint anywhere.
Not sure why they did not put it in there in the article but it is the footprint i add here that they speak about. Can it be fake? yes, it can, but personally, I do believe the human race (not exactly the same as us) did live at the time of 500 million years ago. Can I be wrong of course,
 

Attachments

  • 352092aefb94e9fb2138e30c401f4dce--footprint-fossil.jpg
    352092aefb94e9fb2138e30c401f4dce--footprint-fossil.jpg
    41.3 KB · Views: 0

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Not sure why they did not put it in there in the article but it is the footprint i add here that they speak about. Can it be fake? yes, it can, but personally, I do believe the human race (not exactly the same as us) did live at the time of 500 million years ago. Can I be wrong of course,
Is it even a footprint?
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Not sure why they did not put it in there in the article but it is the footprint i add here that they speak about. Can it be fake? yes, it can, but personally, I do believe the human race (not exactly the same as us) did live at the time of 500 million years ago. Can I be wrong of course,

These guys are like the Pharaoh's followers, Moses came with them with a different history then them being ruled by "incarnations of God", and they weren't ready to abandon their theocratic worship of a human for the truth.

These guys make Scientist like these super mind humans, when they have biases - misconceptions - and are severely stupid like the rest of us - and we will only gain insight and intelligence so far as we rely on God's guidance and travel it.

Yes we invented a lot of things in this age, but there is so much knowledge we don't know, and out of the knowledge we know, plenty of it proves God already.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
These guys are like the Pharaoh's followers, Moses came with them with a different history then them being ruled by "incarnations of God", and they weren't ready to abandon their theocratic worship of a human for the truth.

These guys make Scientist like these super mind humans, when they have biases - misconceptions - and are severely stupid like the rest of us - and we will only gain insight and intelligence so far as we rely on God's guidance and travel it.

Yes we invented a lot of things in this age, but there is so much knowledge we don't know, and out of the knowledge we know, plenty of it proves God already.
Yes in my understanding, today's human beings are not as advanced as they where a long time ago (spiritually that is) And they did have technology that is now re-discovered and science struggle to explain it with today's understanding
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Not sure why they did not put it in there in the article but it is the footprint i add here that they speak about. Can it be fake? yes, it can, but personally, I do believe the human race (not exactly the same as us) did live at the time of 500 million years ago. Can I be wrong of course,
It is not fake. It is a natural formation. It looks a little like a footprint, but if one studies it at all that is quickly seen to be natural. Did you read the link early on that explained this?
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
It is not fake. It is a natural formation. It looks a little like a footprint, but if one studies it at all that is quickly seen to be natural. Did you read the link early on that explained this?
Yes, but i have my own understanding and view of what i see in the photo. and to me, it looks like a pair of shoes with a trilobite together. But if others do not think or see the same as me, that's not a problem for me.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
As I repeatedly say, when you get one of these claims for creation/young earth go to Talk Origins...

CC102: Sandal footprint found with trilobites

Debunked, explained

Human being males invented the UFO mass science gained radiation attack, as stated.

Natural humans and Earth life lived and owned natural radiation levels.

Science said that I knowingly removed spatial cooling as put into space, irradiated by the original Sun attack of God O the Earth, God O given its one holy returned out of space wandering prophet/stone asteroid stone body, the Saviour.

And natural history says that males in science when thinking give patented ownership to their thoughts, even though rationally they are researching natural history and natural objects.

Why human egotism was a taught against dis spirited self title.

UFO mass returned owns in machine male science image projection, which would prove by natural identification that a male who invented/caused the attack on the Nature would own his imaged scientific life feed back as advice that a living human being male caused it.

What UFO mass interactive radio wave/extra science radiation does....gives feed back in radiation mass of falsifying natural history.
 

PruePhillip

Well-Known Member
Science does facts not "beliefs".
"Afraid"? Scientists love being wrong, that is how they
learn.

In "theory" at least, or in an ideal world.
I grew up with the raging controversy surrounding "continental drift"
people lost tenure, their jobs, their reputation etc for believing in it.
I recall the reaction to Shechtman's theory on quasi crystals. And
Fred Hoyle's "transpermia."
Anything too far out, too radical, too political and too religious is
fated for rejection and abuse. As they say, "People don't change
their minds, they just die" and another generation can take up the
"belief."
 

Straw Dog

Well-Known Member
Mods, if this OP are in the wrong category feel free to move it.

500 Million-Year-Old Human Footprint Fossil Baffles Scientists

How do creationists and evolutionists see this in their own beliefs?
How come that science has not spoken about finding like this the same way they speak of other forms of science?
Are science afraid of saying they are wrong? or does it go deeper than that?

I do love sci-fi...

It either means time travelers on vacation or...

That the history of the Earth is much older than we realized.

How many human dramas have taken place? How many people have died seeking a better life?

What is the rational and compassionate way to carry the human legacy forward?

Stay tuned for the next episode of humanity+.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
I do love sci-fi...

It either means time travelers on vacation or...

That the history of the Earth is much older than we realized.

How many human dramas have taken place? How many people have died seeking a better life?

What is the rational and compassionate way to carry the human legacy forward?

Stay tuned for the next episode of humanity+.

Sci Fi as credulity for frauds and nonsense like 500,000,000 yr old
human footprints, not so much.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
In "theory" at least, or in an ideal world.
I grew up with the raging controversy surrounding "continental drift"
people lost tenure, their jobs, their reputation etc for believing in it.
I recall the reaction to Shechtman's theory on quasi crystals. And
Fred Hoyle's "transpermia."
Anything too far out, too radical, too political and too religious is
fated for rejection and abuse. As they say, "People don't change
their minds, they just die" and another generation can take up the
"belief."

You are taking a greater extreme than you think
I am.

You cannot give any example of loss of jobs over continental drift.
Loss of tenure? Nonsense!

It is true that some cannot change their minds, but
with c drift, there was no theory until a mechanism
could be shown.

I should have maybe have said "science" as a whole
loves to be wrong, tho that has its own prob as science
does not think feel or do anything.
 

PruePhillip

Well-Known Member
You are taking a greater extreme than you think
I am.

You cannot give any example of loss of jobs over continental drift.
Loss of tenure? Nonsense!

It is true that some cannot change their minds, but
with c drift, there was no theory until a mechanism
could be shown.

I should have maybe have said "science" as a whole
loves to be wrong, tho that has its own prob as science
does not think feel or do anything.

Actually, many people were consigned to the wilderness over this "continental drift"
thingo. I recall an amazing article in a Readers Digest in the 1970's about it. This
became a generational thing - some did polls on beliefs amongst geologists, and
slowly the younger ones were coming around to it before the early 1960's when
"sea floor spreading" clinched it. The science here wasn't that geology was similar
on either sides of some continents - it was exactly the same.
 
Top