• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should Transgender Athletes compete in sports?

Should Transgender Athletes compete in sports?

  • Yes

    Votes: 17 73.9%
  • No

    Votes: 7 30.4%
  • I don't know

    Votes: 1 4.3%

  • Total voters
    23

Koldo

Outstanding Member
Physical characteristics give advantages. This is true across athletic sport. Why are we only singling out physical characteristics of trans people - or of cis women who don't adhere to gender norms - as "unfair?"

Because for some reason it has been decided it would be unfair to have women competing against men.
But is that really unfair, and if so, why ? I think that to address this issue we need to start with this question.
Why is one competitive advantage ( being male ) considered unfair while others ( such as being taller depending on the sport ) not considered unfair ?
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Is this all you can bring up to this conversation ?
I haven't had enough coffee today to want to correct your misunderstanding of gender identity vs. physiological sex... particularly not if you're unwilling to educate yourself.
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
I haven't had enough coffee today to want to correct your misunderstanding of gender identity vs. physiological sex... particularly not if you're unwilling to educate yourself.

I am well-educated on that distinction. Can you address what I have stated now ?
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
Not well-educated enough to understand the difference between "man" and "male," apparently.


Nope.

Holy moly. Did you really get so caught up on my usage of 'men' and 'male', which is not incorrect by the way even though it might not be the way you use those terms, that you refuse to talk about the actual subject of my post ? Okay. Up to you. Have a good day then.
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
As for anyone else that might interested in a different point of view:

I find it a bit funny when people say that it is unfair, as if it meant much, for transgender women to compete in the same category as cisgender women. That is because, generally speaking, to be a top tier player in a highly competitive sport requires not only a lot of hard work but also a certain combination of physiological attributes that one must have lucked out to inherit. Try to be a short top tier basketball player or a tall top tier gymnast and see how that goes. Sports are, generally once again, not intended to be fair to everyone that wants to participate.
 

lostwanderingsoul

Well-Known Member
Let me ask a question based on two examples. Example 1. A man goes to the doctor and says he feels like a wpman trapped in a man's body The doctor says if the man pays a lot of money the doctoe can give him hormones and surgery to make him lok like a woman. The man pays and the work is done and he tells everyone he is now a woman. Example 2. A man goes to the doctoe and says he fels like a dog trapped in a man's body. The doctor says if he pays a lot of money the doctor can use drugs and surgery to make him lok like a dog. The man pays the money and the work is done and he starts walking on all-fours and tels people he is a gog. Now the question. How many of these two men are still men? How many are women? How many are dogs? If you say one is a man and one is a woman, why do you discriminate against be trans-species? Both simply changed their appearance, not their real self.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Wanderer From Afar
Premium Member
Let me ask a question based on two examples. Example 1. A man goes to the doctor and says he feels like a wpman trapped in a man's body The doctor says if the man pays a lot of money the doctoe can give him hormones and surgery to make him lok like a woman. The man pays and the work is done and he tells everyone he is now a woman. Example 2. A man goes to the doctoe and says he fels like a dog trapped in a man's body. The doctor says if he pays a lot of money the doctor can use drugs and surgery to make him lok like a dog. The man pays the money and the work is done and he starts walking on all-fours and tels people he is a gog. Now the question. How many of these two men are still men? How many are women? How many are dogs? If you say one is a man and one is a woman, why do you discriminate against be trans-species? Both simply changed their appearance, not their real self.
Transsexualism has been shown to be a real medical condition by science. There's neurological, genetic and physical differences between transsexuals and cis people. Neurologically, our brains are more similar to those of the sex we identify as. We often have hormone issues before starting HRT, as well. Transsexualism may be an intersex condition.

Please show me the scientific evidence showing that it is possible to be "trans-species". Oh, you can't. So just stop trolling and posting utter garbage.
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
Let me ask a question based on two examples. Example 1. A man goes to the doctor and says he feels like a wpman trapped in a man's body The doctor says if the man pays a lot of money the doctoe can give him hormones and surgery to make him lok like a woman. The man pays and the work is done and he tells everyone he is now a woman. Example 2. A man goes to the doctoe and says he fels like a dog trapped in a man's body. The doctor says if he pays a lot of money the doctor can use drugs and surgery to make him lok like a dog. The man pays the money and the work is done and he starts walking on all-fours and tels people he is a gog. Now the question. How many of these two men are still men? How many are women? How many are dogs? If you say one is a man and one is a woman, why do you discriminate against be trans-species? Both simply changed their appearance, not their real self.

Doesn't this mostly come downs to how you are defining terms such as 'dog', 'woman' and 'man' ?
What makes a dog a dog ?
What makes a woman a woman ?
And what makes a man a man ?

If all that counts is the assigned sex and species, then they will all be men even after the hormones and surgeries.
But how do you understand those terms ?
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
It's not "hair-splitting". I was correcting you when you made a factually incorrect statement.

I asked you not to devolve this into a debate about semantics. Didn't I ?

There was no correcting in your post. You simply use the word differently. That's all. You consider it sufficient to have a gender reassignment surgery and to display the secondary sex characteristics to be a biological woman. I do not consider that sufficient.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Wanderer From Afar
Premium Member
I asked you not to devolve this into a debate about semantics. Didn't I ?

There was no correcting in your post. You simply use the word differently. That's all. You consider it sufficient to have a gender reassignment surgery and to display the secondary sex characteristics to be a biological woman. I do not consider that sufficient.
And your opinion is just wrong. This is a matter of facts and science, not semantics. Much of what makes a male a male and a female a female comes down to hormones. Change that, and you're changing their biology since hormones are what the body runs on.
 
Top