To me, a loser is a person with no drive or initiative who leeches off of others.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
yep.....no paper labelWell that's not too bad . . .
Wait, generic??
That's a loosy approach, some surly ease to give...
Only a fool is content with what he will lose... so it's all about what is worthy to possess, worthy to let go, what is worthy to desire for, on-householder.
and the whole world loses ….all at onceOnly a fool passes judgement on things he doesn't understand.
Carelessness is also a reason for becoming a loser, on-fading-householder. Not to speak of even whole families becoming loser...You know, I think if I knew what you were saying . . .
. . . I still wouldn't care.
Carelessness is also a reason for becoming a loser, on-fading-householder.
Careless of giving it a honest prove when someone either praise or blames, on-decaying-householder.Depends on what you're careless about.
Careless of giving it a honest prove when someone either praise or blames, on-decaying-householder.
If not taking what is not essence for essence and essence for not essence, one would neither hold on nor be destinated to lose.
yep.....no paper label
black ink
no company logo
no expiration date
and it smelled like dog food
fry it up and use a LOT of mustard
I don't know......maybe haggis would have been better
no......wait
starvation might be better
If a perception like this inspires good householder to possible leave his golden cage one day, or makes him believe that he could fly, thats fine. He shouldn't feel deprived of his supportive hopes.Doesn't seem to have worked for you either.
I'm guessing if Jesus, Buddha, or Saint Francis of Assisi were alive today, they would have no family, no girlfriend, no car, little money, and would probably walk or ride their bicycle everywhere.
By many people standards, they would be losers.
Whose to say that celebrities are any more winners then some lonesome soul that spends all their time meditating in a park or in a church pew.
Many of the saints were dirt poor , had few friends, were laughed at and mocked, and even lived in dugouts or caves, apparently accomplishing nothing. Do such people sound like losers?
Define loser
If a perception like this inspires good householder to possible leave his golden cage one day, or makes him believe that he could fly, thats fine. He shouldn't feel deprived of his supportive hopes.
Vogelfrei is something thats possible not even in reach of perception for him, at least not in it's original sense.
On householder wouldn't be able to close the door from outside leaving keys and all possessions, and weapons behind, wouln't he. So sometimes wise not to think that ones own boardes are those of others. Really not smart.if poor label-maker feels the need to hide
On householder wouldn't be able to close the door from outside leaving keys and all possessions, and weapons behind, wouln't he. So sometimes wise not to think that ones own boardes are those of others. Really not smart.
not sure who the bigger loser is
If thinking that everybody is behind bars than it is because of lack being touched by those having successful left the case. Being in such a hopeless state of the fox and the grapes there will be not much hope: and such is called loser, or? Somebody pointed such already out in this tread. One content, even proud of what is actually already gone, decay, such is indeed a loser, whether he sees or not.That's great, you've come to realize that one possible reason everyone seems to be behind bars is because they happen to be passing by your own cage. That's progress.