Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Uh I don’t think others have my flaws -
Putting words on my mouth again huh?
OK internet troll (never really knew what that meant - thanks!!)
Yes I speak English - that’s not obvious to you?
Are you able to read English ? Because I’m not speaking to you am I?
These are some very basic terms that you should know. The only reason that Wikipedia ever had reliability issues was the ability for almost anyone to contribute had its drawbacks early on. Now it is constantly checked and rechecked and it is not so easy to post there as it used to be. I knew one poster on another site that tried to "prove" that Wikipedia is not reliable by updating an article himself. The only problem is that he put in a valid change to an article. He was not going to risk his membership by putting in something that he knew to be false. In other words instead of demonstrating that it was not reliable by putting in false information he showed how the current model makes it unlikely to be trolled.
At any rate, the Ark myth only harms Christianity. It can be shown to be false from countless different angles. The story itself makes claims and those claims can be tested.