tas8831
Well-Known Member
You mean the stuff you copy pasted without attribution?Too bad...ignoring the evidence I presented, is on you.
Figures!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You mean the stuff you copy pasted without attribution?Too bad...ignoring the evidence I presented, is on you.
Figures!
All humans were bad but 8. Seems like the system was a pretty crappy one such that nearly all humans ended up being bad. To include infants and such.only if God was taking out T Rex along with all the 'bad' humans
Do you ever pause to reflect on how remarkable
it is that you, who have never studied any of
the subject matter still somehow know more than
any researcher on earth?
but if T Rex was up and about....All humans were bad but 8. Seems like the system was a pretty crappy one such that nearly all humans ended up being bad. To include infants and such.
Good one!but if T Rex was up and about....
he must have been really......really bad
All humans were bad but 8. Seems like the system was a pretty crappy one such that nearly all humans ended up being bad. To include infants and such.
Hell Creek rock formation in Montana has both shark and T Rex fossils.
Seems to lean toward rather than against the Noah epic.
Data reported in the Journal of Paleontology pp1-19, 21 Jan 2019
What say you?
In any case land and sea creatures fossilized in close proximity is consistent with the flood epoch.
We also see a high mix of dinosaur and mammals buried in the gobi dessert
In any case land and sea creatures fossilized in close proximity is consistent with the flood epoch.
We also see a high mix of dinosaur and mammals buried in the gobi dessert
But he has patents! PATENTS!
How can he be wrong about anything?????
Why would sharks be killed by a worldwide flood?
Unless, of course, God magically changed them for awhile, like He put all the elephants and such to sleep aboard the ArkYou do know that fresh water organisms
need fresh water, marine ones need fresh water, and
intertidal organisms need to have the tide?
And that none of them would get what they need
in this "flood"?
What about a beach or an estuary?
Unless, of course, God magically changed them for awhile, like He put all the elephants and such to sleep aboard the Ark
Once you've separated your beliefs from evidence and reason you might believe almost anything.
Tom
Well, at least that is a tangible excuse!When the Gods of Sumer flooded the world and destroyed humankind a bit earlier the reason was that they were NOISY.
It could be, but the particular circumstances
would need to be examined. Land animals are
commonly washed down rivers and into
bays and estuaries; storm tides will strand
marine creatures inland.
What is most important though-and please
make an effort here- is that evidence "consistent
with" is not proof.
Your suspect is a tall black man. The victim
said it was a tall black man did it!
So far, we have consistent evidence.
Now, as it turns out later, the tall black man
is a bank president who was at a meeting
in St. Louis when the purse snatching was
in N. Omaha.
So the "consistent evidence" on one detail is
not merely insufficient, but the theory that he
did it is disproved. Impossible.
In the case of "flood" there is a huge abundance
of such disproof, but the existence of polar
ice deeply predating any possible flood is
disproof of any hypothesis that land / sea
creature fossilized near eachother "leans
toward " flood.
Of more interest here is why you persist in
your belief in "flood" and seek out things that
you think might lean somewhere. (Without
of course, studying the relevant facts to see if
it even is consistent with your hypothesis)
Why must you try to bring in more
"evidence" ( look! Our suspect wears glasses!
So did the perp!!) when the hypothesis has
been irrefutably disproved?
So, could you maybe explain what is really
going on with your endless effort to salvage
the flood hypothesis?
And not having been sufficiently pwned in this thread, the engineer creationist has tottered off to make a couple more similar threads, just as vacuous in nature, and surely just as likely to be, in effect, post and runs...
......when the hypothesis has
been irrefutably disproved?