• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Reconsidering Non-theism

RedDragon94

Love everyone, meditate often
They don't believe the Bible is true, so there is no need to prove them wrong.
I'm walking away from Christianity not because the words of the Bible are all wrong but because I think the God of the Bible is likely to not exist. But I don't know. (Agnosticism) I could be wrong and be right back to Christianity tomorrow if I'm honest. What I am trying to do right now is just be critical with my thinking.
 

InChrist

Free4ever
Is that battle won or lost based on what a Christian does?
I think, according to the scriptures, for the born again believer it is based on what Christ did and does.

But thanks be to God! He gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ. 1 Cor. 15:57

For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do. Eph. 2:10
 

atanu

Member
Premium Member
..... I've got some questions about the supernatural.

.....but like Odin or Hecate or the Loa have never called out to me really.

.....then why are there virtually no legitimate miracles coming out of....?
.

In my opinion, you are looking here and there but not where you are required to look.
 

tayla

My dog's name is Tayla
I'm walking away from Christianity not because the words of the Bible are all wrong but because I think the God of the Bible is likely to not exist. But I don't know. (Agnosticism) I could be wrong and be right back to Christianity tomorrow if I'm honest. What I am trying to do right now is just be critical with my thinking.
I think the God of the Bible clearly does not exist. If there is a God he/she can only be derived via philosophy, not religion. Revealed religions and revealed spiritual paths are not trustworthy sources of truth and knowledge.

Since the Bible and Christianity are provably false, there is no reason to consider any of their truth claims; they should all be rejected out of hand.

I think what is not knowable is this: whether there is a God. But what is certainly knowable is this: that if there is a God, he/she is nothing like the Christian conception of God.
 

Shantanu

Well-Known Member
I think the God of the Bible clearly does not exist. If there is a God he/she can only be derived via philosophy, not religion. Revealed religions and revealed spiritual paths are not trustworthy sources of truth and knowledge.

Since the Bible and Christianity are provably false, there is no reason to consider any of their truth claims; they should all be rejected out of hand.

I think what is not knowable is this: whether there is a God. But what is certainly knowable is this: that if there is a God, he/she is nothing like the Christian conception of God.
In order to prove or disprove the existence of God whether or not He is like the Christian conception, one needs to have an scientifically sound experimental strategy.
 

wellwisher

Well-Known Member
I guess I'm wondering if the Bible is as true as it claims to be and God really takes away sin through Jesus' sacrifice, why do Christians still sin?

The answer is humans have free will and choice. Jesus offers a path, among other possible path, where freedom from sin is possible. However, this is not the only path available to free will. There are also forces at work, that make the correct choice, look like the wrong choice, causing sin to remain.

Picture you come to a cross roads where there are three doors. One of the doors leads to escape from sin. The other two lead to sin, with one door less sinful than the other. This is the symbol of Jesus on the cross between two thieves. If you lack faith, you will need to depend on others to help you choose. This is not an easy choice if you are given bad information.

Consider the collusion delusion, run by the Democrat party, against President Trump. The same political group, that ran this scam, also tries undermine the Christian religion anytime it can; atheist blame game. This same leadership group was able to deceived a wide range of otherwise good people, inducing then to take a faux reality path, that lead to the sin of bearing false witness. They had faith in the wrong thing, so their sin was not seen for what it was, until the light appeared.But in the mean time sin was given full freedom.

Although this induction was evil, this experiment, which ran to fruition, was very useful, because it shows what can happen to large groups of people ,so the wrong door is chosen and sin remains, Th sin remains due to unconsciousness of right and wrong, because of faux reality.

Big Government is far more needed when there is sin. If we were all sinless, and everyone would joyfully be their brother's keeper, the welfare state, police state and even the regulatory state would not be needed. This sacrifice of power is not for everyone. Many will work to cloud the air so the door of freedom is not chosen, so power can remain.
 

RedDragon94

Love everyone, meditate often
I think the God of the Bible clearly does not exist. If there is a God he/she can only be derived via philosophy, not religion. Revealed religions and revealed spiritual paths are not trustworthy sources of truth and knowledge.

Since the Bible and Christianity are provably false, there is no reason to consider any of their truth claims; they should all be rejected out of hand.

I think what is not knowable is this: whether there is a God. But what is certainly knowable is this: that if there is a God, he/she is nothing like the Christian conception of God.
I'd agree with the conception of God point.

Still, I think the Bible's spiritual statements can be false and even some ethical positions are wrong and there can still be a good point here and there. It's like reading any piece of literature.
In order to prove or disprove the existence of God whether or not He is like the Christian conception, one needs to have an scientifically sound experimental strategy.
Yes. So we don't know whether or not there is one.
 

RedDragon94

Love everyone, meditate often
The answer is humans have free will and choice. Jesus offers a path, among other possible path, where freedom from sin is possible. However, this is not the only path available to free will. There are also forces at work, that make the correct choice, look like the wrong choice, causing sin to remain.
But why do people still choose the wrong path when sin is not greater than God?
Picture you come to a cross roads where there are three doors. One of the doors leads to escape from sin. The other two lead to sin, with one door less sinful than the other. This is the symbol of Jesus on the cross between two thieves. If you lack faith, you will need to depend on others to help you choose. This is not an easy choice if you are given bad information.
Where is God when you get the bad information? He lets people be deceived.
 

tayla

My dog's name is Tayla
Still, I think the Bible's spiritual statements can be false and even some ethical positions are wrong and there can still be a good point here and there. It's like reading any piece of literature.
Yes, I agree. This is why I don't read fiction.
 

tayla

My dog's name is Tayla
So we don't know whether or not there is one.
I agree that the existence of God cannot be proven. But I think there is good philosophical justification for the kind of God I mention, a God who is good and beautiful and who did not create anything causing suffering. This is not the God of the Bible; that kind of God clearly does not exist.
 

RedDragon94

Love everyone, meditate often
Depends on what investigations you have conducted and whether they were sound investigations.
You can't investigate a being that is completely transcendent and completely immanent at the same time. That's like investigating the personhood of oxygen.
 
Top