Daddy's Pee Pee

[Twilight Hue]

Odd? But it's ok for dad to show his 4 and 6 year old daughter's his Johnson?

I guess it would all depend upon if you're a nudist or just a plain pervert.

I guess it all depends upon how you were raised and educated about all those giggly and wiggly parts of the body.

 

[We Never Know]

A bit odd, but I don't see anything wrong with it.

Of course if you see something wrong with either scenario just what, specifically, would it be?

.

I don't think dad should be showing his young daughters his package. There are other ways to show them the difference. What would happen if those girls told their teacher "dad showed us his johnson"? Or tell the neighbor guy "do you have a thingy like my dad, can I see it? Daddy showed me his". Or they might think it's ok for a man to show them his johnson.
After all he could say his teaching them too. They are many things that can be seen wrong in it.

Now you. Why is it ok for dad to show his daughter's his johnson but you think its odd for mom to show her son's her kitty?

 

[Stanyon]

There are many other ways to teach it, do I think it was sex abuse? No but I'd say it was more than a little misguided especially considering that they are children and they will talk to other children who may then talk to their parents who may then consider it sex abuse. All it takes is one phone call.

 

[Salvador]

.

The other night I was with a group friends talking about this and that, and for whatever reason the conversation drifted into sex education. In comparing how our educations were handled one of the women told a story about a close friend of hers and how she began the sex education of her two young daughters. As the woman in our group remembers it, the girls were about four and six. After her friend had told her daughters about the difference between men and women she had her husband come into the room buck naked so they could see what an actual penis looked like.
After the somewhat dismayed reaction among us died down, all but one of us agreed it was a harmless act, and that the girls probably didn't think much else of it after that, although they may have told their friends---who knows? The one exception among us thought it was sex abuse,


So, what do you think; an inappropriate piece of sex education or not?

How about a reasonable piece of sex education?

.

Prepubescent girls don't ever need to see a full grown man naked. Imo, sex education should be taught strictly on a need to know basis.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Prepubescent girls don't ever need to see a full grown man naked. Imo, sex education should be taught strictly on a need to know basis.

Are penises dangerous to be around or something? It's just a body part and sex is a normal and healthy activity that's extremely important for well-being to know about.

 

[Father Heathen]

Wouldn't a picture have sufficed? What advantage was there to exposing them to his in person? It does give off creepy "grooming" vibes. Maybe it was innocent, but seems like an unusual line of thought behind it.

 

[Salvador]

Are penises dangerous to be around or something? It's just a body part and sex is a normal and healthy activity that's extremely important for well-being to know about.

Sex before puberty is abnormal, hence, sex education doesn't need to be taught to any prepubescent children or to students who are in elementary school grades before the sixth grade.

When a female has her first ever menstrual cycle, then that is when she is mature enough to learn sex education. When a male has his first ever erection, then that is when he is old enough to learn sex education.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Sex before puberty is abnormal, hence, sex education doesn't need to be taught in elementary school grades before the sixth grade.

When a female has her first ever menstrual cycle, then that is when she is mature enough to learn sex education. When a male has his first ever erection, then that is when he is old enough to learn sex education.

Sex education doesn't tell kids to have sex. It's part of health education.

Girls need to know about their periods well before it happens so that they can be prepared beforehand so that they know what to do and not be afraid. Due to stigma, many generations of girls were not (and still not, in some areas) told about their menstrual cycle or bodies so they would freak out when they saw the menstrual fluid, thinking they were sick, injured or dying. Sometimes they would be told it was a curse to Eve and her daughters (that's what my mom was told by her mom). Children need to hear the facts in schools.

Oh, and even fetuses can get erections in the womb so that's a dumb standard to go by.

 

[columbus]

When I was a kid I was bathed naked with everybody including my visits to my aunt's house with some of my cousins.

Heh!
This reminds of many episodes of going to the beach.
I have 3 siblings within 2.5 years of my age. There was a beach not far from our house. Oftentimes we'd go there after supper.
When we got home, my brother and sisters and I would have to strip on the back porch, and one by one my dad would carry us to the giant laundry tub in the basement. He'd dunk us in suds, rinse us off, then dry us, before we were allowed in the house.
It was fun.
Tom

 

[columbus]

Sex before puberty is abnormal, hence, sex education doesn't need to be taught to any prepubescent children or to students who are in elementary school grades before the sixth grade.

When a female has her first ever menstrual cycle or when a male has his first ever erection, then that is when she or he is old enough to learn sex education.

But by then, kids have usually already gotten a big batch of misconceptions, bad attitudes, and misinformation. Even pretty sheltered kids. I certainly did.
Tom

 

[KelseyR]

A rough drawing would have done.

 

[Rational Agnostic]

.

The other night I was with a group friends talking about this and that, and for whatever reason the conversation drifted into sex education. In comparing how our educations were handled one of the women told a story about a close friend of hers and how she began the sex education of her two young daughters. As the woman in our group remembers it, the girls were about four and six. After her friend had told her daughters about the difference between men and women she had her husband come into the room buck naked so they could see what an actual penis looked like.
After the somewhat dismayed reaction among us died down, all but one of us agreed it was a harmless act, and that the girls probably didn't think much else of it after that, although they may have told their friends---who knows? The one exception among us thought it was sex abuse,


So, what do you think; an inappropriate piece of sex education or not?

How about a reasonable piece of sex education?

.

Abuse? Probably not, though others may disagree. Extremely weird and inappropriate? Definitely yes.

 

[Salvador]

Wouldn't a picture have sufficed? What advantage was there to exposing them to his in person? It does give off creepy "grooming" vibes. Maybe it was innocent, but seems like an unusual line of thought behind it.

But by then, kids have usually already gotten a big batch of misconceptions, bad attitudes, and misinformation. Even pretty sheltered kids. I certainly did.
Tom

A book of Kama Sutra sufficed for me learning what I needed to know about sex when I was age 12.

 

[Salvador]

A rough drawing would have done.

Agreed....perhaps a Kama Sutra coloring book would have sufficed.

 

[Salvador]

Sex education doesn't tell kids to have sex. It's part of health education.

Oh, and even fetuses can get erections in the womb so that's a dumb standard to go by.

Didn't occur to me until I was 11. ...This happened when I had a really nice dream about my fifth grade teacher Miss Parker. Soon after this, I had my first ejac*******.

 

[Skwim]

I don't think dad should be showing his young daughters his package. There are other ways to show them the difference. What would happen if those girls told their teacher "dad showed us his johnson"? Or tell the neighbor guy "do you have a thingy like my dad, can I see it? Daddy showed me his". Or they might think it's ok for a man to show them his johnson.
After all he could say his teaching them too. They are many things that can be seen wrong in it.

Now you. Why is it ok for dad to show his daughter's his johnson but you think its odd for mom to show her son's her kitty?

Both are odd, in the sense of uncommon.

odd adjective
\ ˈäd
Definition of odd
6 :differing markedly from the usual, ordinary, or accepted : peculiar


.​

 

[Obsydian]

I learned about sex through school, television and indirectly through my parents.

By my parents, it was a porn mag they thought was well hidden. (I wish it was, because it was almost enough to turn me off to sex.) Television was Red Shoe Diaries on Showtime through the illegal cable we had. And one of the sex education lessons at school involved watching a video in keyboard class of Sinbad dressed up as a condom.

I recommend the last out of all of them.

I wouldn't expect my parents to strut around naked in front of me for any reason unless they were nudists.

 

[Obsydian]

For sex-ed?

You don't need sex ed if you used a pair of scissors on yourself.

 

[PoetPhilosopher]

You don't need sex ed if you used a pair of scissors on yourself.

Turning RF to masochism one post at a time.

 

[Obsydian]

Turning RF to masochism one post at a time.

They'll be a eunuch, so they prolly won't be into masochism after that, either.